NO COLLUSION, NO CONSPIRACY, NO OBSTRUCTION!TRUMP VINDICATED

03/24/2019

[Sarah Barracuda]

THREE years of unbelievable bull sh*t, three years of investigating something that could have been figured out in FIVE MINUTES if it were true..but NO, took almost 3 years of investigating and calling this wonderful human being, OUR President, every disgusting name in the book..and for what, WHY you ask..because the Commie left determined that Donald Trump winning the election in 2016 was a crime in itself..they had it in the bag, turning America full commie, it was all within reach and Trump ruined their plan

[BenLurkin]

Kept Hillary out of prison. Prevented any investigations into Loretta Lynch and Lois Lerner.

[Pilgrim's Progress]

DU is in total meltdown mode.

[SpaceBar]

That last statement destroys any claim Mueller makes of impartiality. “We couldn’t find squat but know deep down the bastard’s guilty...”

[Beave Meister]

CNN heads are exploding. Dana Nash just stated that congress can still go forward with Impeachment hearings. AAAaaaaaaahhhhhhhh. I bathe in their tears...

[Sarah Barracuda]

That’s only because Trump did NOT meet with Mueller but the main thing here is the whole collusion story DIED TODAY

[BenLurkin]

Correct.

[JBW1949]

Democratic Underground...*ROFLMAO*

[Fungi]

All things considered, I like lamb more than beef. Shish kabob, lamb rack, lambs saddle, all are great grilled, then a mild middle eastern sauce, heaven on earth.

[Sarah Barracuda]

impeach for what..he nor his campaign colluded with the Russian Govt to steal the 2016 election..collude for what..BREATHING

[Dr. Ursus]

Yes- mission accomplished!

[dfwgator]

Merry Muellermas!!!!!

[RoseofTexas]

WTH!! Does not exonerated?!!! That’s an open door for the RATS to continue the harassment!! I can’t believe Barr left that in there!! NO FREAKIN COLLUSION MEANS no freakin COLLUSION!! FOLKS what am I missing here?

[dontreadthis]

as long as I can drain off the fat, I agree

[aspasia]

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

exonerate him of what?

[RightGeek]

[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment . . . "


Very strange phrasing. It sounds like they are trying to say, "We found the President's actions were not criminal, but we want to make it sound like they were."

[goldstategop]

They can impeach him for obstruction but the President was within his lawful authority to fire Comey.

A thin reed to go after the President given that Russian collusion is dead.

The Senate will never vote to remove Trump from office.

[UnBubba]

[peggybac]

Get this fricking Brazile off the screen. WHAT A ABSOLUTE MORON - she’s unhinged.