New drop 3045
https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe/status/1105658231198765057
The Tarmac Meeting.
Days Later
.
[JC] “No charges are appropriate
..”
HOW DID HRC OBTAIN SAP (SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS) ON HER PERSONAL SERVER(S)?
ACCESS TO SAP/SCI IS RECORDED IN A LOCAL ACCESS REGISTER OR IN A COMPUTER DATABASE - WHERE ARE THE RECORDS?
IDEN OF ‘SPECIFIC’ SAP/SCI ON THE SERVER PROVIDES A TARGET (ROADMAP) TO REVIEW ACCESS LOGS TO THAT SPECIFIC PROGRAM?
WHAT PROCESS AND/OR SEC CLEARANCE WOULD BE REQ TO WALK-AWAY [TERMINAL_CLEAR] W/ SAP/SCI MATERIAL ‘ELECTRONICALLY’?
Did a Foreign State gain access to the server?
Did a Foreign State gain access to the SAP/SCI material on the server?
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/404192-fbi-denies-trump-claim-that-china-hacked-clintons-private-email
IF THE TOP FBI CHAIN OF COMMAND FOR THE MIDYEAR INVESTIGATION WERE *ALL* FIRED DOES ONE CONCLUDE THE INVESTIGATION WAS NOT CONDUCTED PROPERLY?
DOES ONE CONCLUDE ALL STATEMENTS MADE BY THE FBI (THINK NO HACK OF SERVER AS SINGLE EXAMPLE) COULD BE FALSE?
Take a moment and think about what that means.
[ ]
TREASON.
Q
https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe/status/1105658231198765057 The Tarmac Meeting. Days Later . [JC] "No charges are appropriate .." HOW DID HRC OBTAIN SAP (SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS) ON HER PERSONAL SERVER(S)? ACCESS TO SAP/SCI IS RECORDED IN A LOCAL ACCESS REGISTER OR IN A COMPUTER DATABASE - WHERE ARE THE RECORDS? IDEN OF 'SPECIFIC' SAP/SCI ON THE SERVER PROVIDES A TARGET (ROADMAP) TO REVIEW ACCESS LOGS TO THAT SPECIFIC PROGRAM? WHAT PROCESS AND/OR SEC CLEARANCE WOULD BE REQ TO WALK-AWAY [TERMINAL_CLEAR] W/ SAP/SCI MATERIAL 'ELECTRONICALLY'? Did a Foreign State gain access to the server? Did a Foreign State gain access to the SAP/SCI material on the server? https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/404192-fbi-denies-trump-claim-that-china-hacked-clintons-private-email IF THE TOP FBI CHAIN OF COMMAND FOR THE MIDYEAR INVESTIGATION WERE *ALL* FIRED DOES ONE CONCLUDE THE INVESTIGATION WAS NOT CONDUCTED PROPERLY? DOES ONE CONCLUDE ALL STATEMENTS MADE BY THE FBI (THINK NO HACK OF SERVER AS SINGLE EXAMPLE) COULD BE FALSE? Take a moment and think about what that means. [ ] TREASON. Q
Remember, Hillary mentioned nooses first. Why?
NEW Q POSTS
MARCH 13, 2019
LATE NIGHT
START AT #1195
Answer: It wasn't done electronically from the outside. It took the DELIBERATE action from a person read on to the program (an insider).
It had to be done without the knowledge of the SSO and the program manager/ director. There are specific legal reasons for this.
It also had to be deliberately IGNORED by all those with access to HiLlARy emails. They have specific legal jeopardy for NOT reporting the mishandling of the SAP information.
Had I knowledge of this you would, quite literally, have to kill me to prevent me from reporting it.
There are many and manifest reasons we go to so much time, effort, and expense to keep black programs BLACK. This includes the very EXISTENCE of the program. You would be surprised how much you can deduce from the simple knowledge that an adversary is interested in a particular subject.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
QDrop #3045 instantly put me into a state of "déjà vu":
(The yellow-highlighted Q crumbs directly relate to the adjacent video frames...)
Those of you who've seen my HRC video may recall that I downplayed FBI's Priority #4 ("corruption" -- a la HRC) and chided Comey, et al, for failing to pay proper heed to FBI Priority #2: (counterinteligence -- re the obvious years-long SAP/SCI SCIF security breach).
Although the duties of Secretary of state demand full access to masses of both unclassified and classified information, HRC...
"I never received nor sent any material that was marked CLASSIFIED".