BOOKMark to read later. Anybody have a concise explanation of what these DemonRats are trying to assert, it would be a big help for the Oracle, if I may be so bold as to suggest it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_National_Committee_v._Russian_Federation
About as concise as can be done ...
https://www.lawfareblog.com/summary-democratic-national-committee-v-russian-federation-et-al
Not as concise but more informative ...
It’s a BS civil case, but any given federal court is apt to come to a BS conclusion.
- 1 - INTRODUCTION In this case, the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) seeks to litigate and explain away its candidate’s defeat in the 2016 presidential election. The DNC thus alleges—unburdened by any ac-tual facts—that President Trump’s campaign (Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.; “the Campaign”) conspired with Russia and a hodgepodge of others to publish materials stolen from the DNC’s computer systems. But the DNC does not claim the Campaign had any role in hacking its systems and stealing the materials—it attributes that only to Russia. Nor does the DNC claim the Campaign played any part in publishing the stolen materials—it attributes that only to Russia and WikiLeaks. Instead, the DNC predicates its claims against the Campaign exclusively on allegations that: (1) the Campaign received advance notice of some disclosures; and (2) after disclosures occurred, the Cam-paign made political use of the revealed information and publicly encouraged additional disclosures.