exactly right. they create plausible deniability traps which can be debunked, and then play their own victim card.
oswald is a monster, this is apparent, but he thinks he’s clever and has laid a pattern of “oh you misunderstood, you should stop looking” traps.
Is it useful to have something that “compromises” you, but can be proven to be a fake later?
So when the truth about youwill eventually come out, the press can always report, yeah, you know, when people first said this and that, it was a big nothingburger, because it was proven to be nothing more than a fake (implying that the truth is probably nothing more than another fake).
Like with videos…no evidence…because the can be faked, says the media (BEFORE any video becomes public).
Is it useful to have something that “compromises” you, but can be proven to be a fake later?
So when the truth about youwill eventually come out, the press can always report, yeah, you know, when people first said this and that, it was a big nothingburger, because it was proven to be nothing more than a fake (implying that the truth is probably nothing more than another fake).
Like with videos…no evidence…because the can be faked, says the media (BEFORE any video becomes public).