Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant
If the efforts to make the system work through prosecution and release of classified information fails, the NSA doesn’t have a mechanism to sweep in and save the day. It is a repository of information and geeks. The US military has its own geeks, but it has significantly more firepower.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I am working from a different set of information than this, as I described earlier.

Also, I do NOT see POTUS as applying some sort of "military option" to take out the DS, as many seem fond of imagining.

President Trump DID NOT come to office to set up a military dictatorship.

His answers to the threats facing us will be LEGAL and CONSTITUTIONAL.

There has been a lot of noise accompanying Q about using the military, military tribunals etc.

THIS DID NOT COME FROM Q. I suspect it to be disinformation in fact, meant to undermine the real stuff.

1,603 posted on 02/24/2019 2:58:10 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1571 | View Replies ]


To: Disestablishmentarian

:: the NSA doesn’t have a mechanism to sweep in and save the day. ::

But, since they are a repository of [all] information and “less firepower”, they do have a MOAB they can drop.

See my previous thoughts on the “NSA accidental info-drop oopsie” possibility.

chaff


1,606 posted on 02/24/2019 3:01:50 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies ]

To: Disestablishmentarian
THIS DID NOT COME FROM Q.

Hmmm. Then why did Q post about military courts?

1,613 posted on 02/24/2019 3:06:46 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies ]

To: Disestablishmentarian
I am working from a different set of information than this, as I described earlier.

Yes, the NSA sniper squad that takes care of rogue elements of the US intelligence apparatus that you mentioned. So, plan B is to have Pelosi, Hillary, Brennan, Comey, Flake, Corker and W taken out? As well as the people running the MSM and their on camera flunkies? Then what?

Does the NSA have the ability to suspend Congress? Because if that happens, Congress will convict Trump in an impeachment trial. No one will accept murders of politicians or intelligence officials or bureaucrats. They might accept their arrest, trial and conviction, after presentation of evidence and, as stated, transparent dissemination of information to the entire country. Does the NSA have the people who would do that? I don't think so. It seems from all we have seen over the last many months that the Q operation is a military intelligence operation, supported by information collected by the NSA. I don't see any viable way for the NSA to be an option, unto itself, for the country, if the Plan fails. Plan B is difficult to imagine, but it would have to involve the entire military apparatus, including NSA's data. They may have been working on it ever since Obama began working on his plan to bring down the US.

President Trump DID NOT come to office to set up a military dictatorship.

No he did not, and that is why it is the last option of a dying republic. The trick in such instances is how to restore a constitution after you have saved it. See Civil War 1. The Romans never did; the British had numerous fights over their government's form beginning in the 1600s and eventually, Parliament won. Chile? They have a functioning democracy now, after the commies tried to take it. Maybe that can happen to Venezuela. The history of such things is pretty bleak, but not entirely without cause for optimism, if it ever came to that. I tell you one thing, I do not agree to the forfeiture of our rights, or lands and our system at the hands of illegal alien voters being used to replace us, and under the auspices of a communist plot decades in the making. Everything they have done to us has been extraconstitutional.

His answers to the threats facing us will be LEGAL and CONSTITUTIONAL.

That's exactly what Q is saying. He says there's no other way to do it, except with transparency and legally. And then Q adds...."Except 1". He's not talking NSA.

I suspect it to be disinformation in fact, meant to undermine the real stuff.

But NSA death squads are not going to undermine the real stuff?

1,677 posted on 02/24/2019 4:14:27 PM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson