that was that one ... (FISA directive) ... today is ripe for another!
I’ve been thinking about the considered timeline(s) and there have been discussions for some time here.
My understanding is that IG cannot dump until Huber (and possibly the Mule) dump first because GJ materials etc. can’t be referenced until + unless they’ve been used + exposed.
Ultimately DECLAS could come at any time because it derives from presidential initiative. However, the same considerations above re Huber/Mule + IG applies at large; this is another reason why the [RR] “objections” could also have been in play ala “we have to wait until ...” (WH or BH)
I continue to think that it’s best, legally & effectively, to drop the bombs first and then explain via IG + DECLAS.
The timeline + continuing guidance from “Q” is the opposite ala then the fun begins ... but there’s a lot of “fun” and PAIN to be had.
Still + ever curious ... TBD ;)
My interpretation is Mueller will report to A.G., possibly this week, COMPLETING his task; and then DECLAS and other actions.
Both you and I and others here have been known to tick off milestones that needed to occur, most recently including Kavanaugh confirmation and 2016 election (securing Senate).
Evidently, the completion of Mueller (even if not immediately made public) is another. This makes sense, as the original calls for SC were due to firing of Comey ... and the STORM will include MUCH BIGGER BOOMS.
In summary, if Mueller were still in business, then there would be a S#itstorm of screaming from FAKE NEWS and many others to have Mueller EXPAND into new areas.
There is precedent for such revival by the way. Ken Starr was about to close up shop with NOTHING—literally days away—and then Monica Lewinsky dropped in their lap.