I have been following the case closely.
In the article, it was not just one informant.
The officer had several informants. None of them remembered going to the house in question and doing a buy. Heroin of the type supposedly purchased was found in the city vehicle the officer used.
Goines is the second officer suspended in the case. The first was suspended for other inconsistencies about the warrant used.
If Police Chief Acevedo lied about officer Goines giving false information for the warrant, he can be sued for libel. I doubt he would do so without very strong evidence.
This case never met the smell test. Neither victim had a criminal record. They were married for 20 years, and lived in the same modest house for the entire 20 years.
The neighbors never saw any activity around the house, and described the couple as quiet people who kept to themselves.
It doesn't fit the profile of a drug house, or of drug dealers.
Well said
All these folks come on here to act like we are cop haters
Havent read much at all about the case like we have
They are being emotive
I dont hate cops
I have assisted federal law enforcement when the occasion has arisen in my life
I dont like corruption or militarization or politization of law enforcement
I have business relationships with local and federal law right now
I dont like no knock raids except for WOT
Nor highway profile cash stops
Or at airports
Or confiscation without conviction
Having endured the last item myself
They love to get in your piggy bank
Local cops keep it and spend however they like
New pickups
Fancy ARs
Junkets overseas
Social giddyups
Its a license to steal
Make no mistake, I have made no conclusions one way or the other with regards to this case. Let due process take its course. I want to hear the evidence as it is presented. Otherwise, we undermine the very foundations our legal system was built upon.