[Jack Black]

Mathematically impossible. Those who challenge have an agenda or are simply still asleep.
The NARRATIVE has them. Q

What is mathematically impossible? I've been keeping up on my Q posts, but I must have missed the mathematical proof of Q.

Q deniers have a pretty long list too, of failed predictions. Q post #1, for instance. I notice you never address that. I don't have an agenda, other than knowing the truth. We are c all captive to narratives, even you Bagster.

[grey_whiskers]

Here Jack, maybe this will help you with all those who made it through before the Wall was finished.

[bagster]

What is mathematically impossible? I've been keeping up on my Q posts, but I must have missed the mathematical proof of Q.

The simple math of the NUMBER of Q proofs, derpasaurus. You may not believe them individually, but you cannot deny them in their numerousness.

For you to do so, means that you have no logic and that Q is right when he says,

Those (you) who challenge have an agenda or are simply still asleep.
The NARRATIVE has them (you).

_________

You say;

I don't have an agenda, other than knowing the truth. We are c all captive to narratives, even you Bagster.

The difference between our narratives, Jacky Derp, is that mine follows logic and undeniable truth. You are still under the spell of the old, unexpanded thinking and indoctrination. You won't and CAN'T see beyond your narrative.

There is so much proof out there, yet you REFUSE to see it. Your boxed in mind will not allow you to think in another way. A new, abstract way.

Jacky boy, it is hopeless to argue about the veracity of the Q operation with you or anybody else. You are hopeless, and you won't come around until CNN announces that "Q is real" or you watch those words come out of Trump's lips (on CNN). And even then I wonder if your pride will allow you to believe.

Either way, derpo. I will not argue about the reality of Q with you ever again. It's a waste of time.

You carry on. Beyond the trees preferably. We here, understand fundamentally, what is going on here.

p.s. I understand that you come here cause this is where the action is. Its a very attractive place isn't it? Reminiscent of FR when it was young?

Who wants to frolic with complainers and giver-uppers all day, right?

Toodles. Working on an Oracle now. No time to chat.

p.p.s. Did you see what happened to your compa "Trump The Evil Left" aka "Enchantgay"? He had a seizure/head explosion and got banned/suspended.

#HateKills

p.p.p.s. As an after-thought, the sad thing is, you'd be a VERY productive force in the #GreatAwakening and an awesome Trump ally if only you could pull your head out of your ass.

Your not a bad fellow, really.

Or are you?

🤪

[Steven W.]

Specifically, that post referred to the numbers of times there have been zero or near zero deltas or designated intervals between POTUS tweets & "Q" posts and the degree to which such things further correlate as exemplified yesterday. There was another (near exact) zero delta amidst the prior batch of posts. People (including myself) are always amazed at this! To get it to happen once might be considered a fluke but to have such a number of repeated hits or near hits exceeds the realm of alternative explanation. If you take the odds of it happening once ... and, then, again, you're in the exponential realm. Then it happens again, and then again, and then again, etc., you're in the realm of mathematically impossible i.e. one in a billion times one in a billion ...

Devices in the same location w/ the same military encrypt w/ the same service yet hitting send spreads an unusual gap (even accounting for pic/non-pic transmit +/- data II).

Sometimes we get a hit, sometimes we don't.

We are past that now, correct?

-----------------------------

Mathematically impossible.
Those who challenge have an agenda or are simply still asleep.
The NARRATIVE has them.
Q


The point of the posts was that if you can accept something as being possible that is so unlikely and improbably to the point of being mathematically impossible to conjecture ... recall they explained sometime early on they'd run the numbers on what percentage of people could be 'red-pilled' and there's always going to be some number, friend or foe, that just won't or can't do it ;)

WWG1WGA :)