Replies

Like [-30] interesting ? or is that incidental.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DIG INTO COUNTDOWN CONCEPT - REVIVING OF PAST Q ELEMENTS

The Elements we will be looking at:
[5] (or other mentions of the number 5)
NP in proximity to number 5 and in particular the configuration of 5+1
EYES ONLY
NARRATIVE

I had mentioned the possibility of March 5 being significant, and In our conversation, stylin19a asked:

Like [-30] interesting ? or is that incidental.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Stylin, for some reason, I was thinking that March 5 was a significant date, but can’t recall now why.

I just did a search for “5” on qmap.pub.

There are many “5:5” references, and most of the free standing 5s are in reference to “Five minutes.” See ichabod1’s post 1157 this thread, for insight into the meaning of that. His conclusion is “5:5=reliable source, important information.”

#577 references “SNOW WHITE [1, 2, and 5] offline.” [Notice the “5” inside the kill box, which in this case is indicative of the technological AI wonder that had been in the hands of the Derps and had been taken off line to them.]

#626
January 27th 2018. [Has an interesting configuration involving “5.”]

“Chatter exploding.
Change of narrative will be required.

[Note: We see Mockingbird media scrambling so hard for a new narrative - especially in VA]

[-4][-5]. [We see our “-5” in a kill box]
Public to awaken [mass-start].

[Note:Yes, it is happening! Bagster showed us that link in Oracle with awakening as to organization of good stuff for our side.]

Sleeping pill reject.
OP Mockingbird FAILURE.
FAKE>REAL.
BLIND>20/20.
KILL_CHAIN.
Where we go one, we go ALL>”

[Note: The circumstances of “change of narrative” is precisely what the Mockingbird Media is facing right now. We ARE in the Great Awakening.... or at least its start, as evidenced by the visit bagster made to the forum and found someone saying that they reject Q - but oh my - stuff going well on our side looks “COORDINATED!” The “[-4][-5]” has that same countdown configuration as what we are looking at with “[-30].”]

I did find this “5” reference that could be strangely relevant to right now, but it takes me a different direction:

#1188
19 Apr 2018

Engineers.
Data mine NP +1 +5.

[This configuration of “5” caught my eye, especially in its proximity to “NP.”]

All.
Architects.
Build profile 1XD x7
All.
Eyes only. [My own eyes were caught by this phrase.]
Q

Uh oh... this is me falling into a big hole - (How do you DO that, stylin19a??)

Does anyone know if that drop was solved wrt the “Nancy Pelosi ‘+1+5’?” I don’t recall, and don’t have at the moment any guesses as to what that “+1+5” could mean. I guess I’ll just have to keep my eyes open! ;-)

#455 Dec 23 2017
[Shows a configuration of the “5” in a kill box. I think it has been held that this particular configuration was referring to the change in times between Q posts and Q+ tweets]
Graphics should be in same time zone.
Delta relevant.
[5]Today
[10]Past
[15]Past

#705. Feb 10 2018. This is the entire drop, and Q does not sign it. The Anons at qmap.pub have named it “Shanghai Pudong International Airport E5 Terminal.” Recently Diane Feinstein - or Huma were shown in a picture of what I think was that same airport. (Now I’m wondering if NP could be there....I have no basis for that wonderment, but it is perhaps not just an idle question.) Could that [5] have something to do with a date, as well as being the terminal number? Did DIFI’s wrong doing terminate at that E5 terminal? Is that where she was caught - or told she was caught?:

The entire drop #705:
[5]

So I’m finding the number 5 often appears in Q drops, as well as a good portion of those appearances in a kill box. There seems also to be a pattern which I first noticed in #1188 where Q mentions it in conjunction with Nancy Pelosi. I do not know if the other instances I found also have to do with her or not, but like flowers, I’m just collecting them.
The word “Narrative” also is found in proximity to the number 5, especially those in a kill box. The number 5 can also be found associated with high tech/ IT.

Who are the 5+1? Are they always the same, or different? I suspect different.... but still there is that pattern. Why that pattern? I Don’t Know.

END PART ONE….. [because there is more!]

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

DIG INTO COUNTDOWN CONCEPT - REVIVING OF PAST Q ELEMENTS

PART TWO
The post #1188 admonishes us to look at and “data mine NP +1+5.” I found a few where configurations of people are clearly 5+1.

#887 March 2018 mentions a “+1 +5” circumstance - could this be relevant? Especially because the post was March 8, 2018?

#887
“DEFCON, No Such Agency.
We knew.
How did we know?
Who did WE meet?
NEED TO KNOW KEPT TO 5 PEOPLE + SPECIAL SEC DETAIL [My caps]
Future proves past.”

Q does not make it clear if the 5+1 people here are derps or white hats. There is another meeting we will see next where it is definitely derps. And, is it possible these two drops are referring to the same meeting? I Don’t Know.

There is another drop with a configuration of 5+1 configuration:

#959 - Mark Zuckerberg Meeting. [We see the “5” in conjunction with “Narrative.”]
20 Mar 2018

“MZ.
RT.
Big meeting.
Cell phones left at door.
+8
5 political. [There’s a +5. ]
1 former intel dir [Um, could that +1 be Brennan?]
Mask & Spin
IDEN friendly ‘insiders’
MSM support +talking points
Shift narrative [”Narrative” is in proximity to the pattern of 5+1]
FAIL…”

#1870 Aug 14
Has to do with narrative - and that autists must destroy the DS “narrative.” It uses the “5 + 1” configuration with more orders of magnitude:

…Are the emails in the WL Podesta dump AUTH?
Has POTUS made a statement as PRESIDENT that hasn’t ended up being TRUE AND CORRECT?
DESTROY THE NARRATIVE. [“Narrative” in proximity of “5+1” as we see in #1188]
This is MUCH BIGGER than even AUTISTS can imagine (MUCH BIGGER!).
REPEATS necessary.
5,000+ new/day…. [“5+1” configuration, except it is 5000 to 1 “new/day”]

[Note: 5 + 1, but larger scale - and the pattern is in proximation to “Narrative”]

WELCOME TO THE AWAKENING.
FREE INFORMATION.
POWER BACK TO THE PEOPLE.
WITH KNOWLEDGE COMES POWER.

[As seen above in #626 in Part One, that drop mentions “Narrative in conjunction with the [5]. So #626, 959, and 1870 have the number “5” in proximity to the word “narrative” as in #1188. More particularly, “5+1” seems to be the dominant pattern of its appearance.

My sense, of course, in this case, Q seems to be comparing the power of the anons with the power of the derps. They are 5+1 while the anons are 5000 to 1.... and the “1” is a “new/day”]

#836 March 3, 2018
Has a reference to “Mission 5 Russia Link” - presumably one of Snowden’s several missions.

#1010
April 4 2018

References “5” in a kill box - but also in the kill box is “days.” Relevant? I Don’t Know. It implicates unfolding of events in UK/Germany in that context of a 5 day window. A big list of Derp wrong doing such as vaccines, cancer, tobacco, etc. precedes the following:

#1010
“…ULTIMATE WIN [DEATH + MONEY].
THE FED.
ROTHSCHILD.
‘CONSPIRACY’
‘CONSPIRACY’
‘CONSPIRACY’

UK/GER [5 days]

Choice is yours.
REVELATIONS.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Q”

#453

Has a [5] reference, also in the form of what we are currently speculating as possible countdown mode. IT EVEN SAYS “COUNTDOWN”!

“…How can FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, the man in charge, along with leakin’ James Comey, of the Phony Hillary Clinton investigation (including her 33,000 illegally deleted emails) be given $700,000 for wife’s campaign by Clinton Puppets during investigation?
[5]
Previous also logged in graphic form [10] + others?
Timestamps important.
Countdown?
Markers.
Q”

For those seeking to mark a beginning of COUNTDOWN, this above drop #453 may be helpful.

But still “March 5” clangs a distant bell of significance in my head. Oh well. Tabling that for now.

The take away for me is that the word “Narrative” and the number pattern “5+1” of a collection of people seems to be in proximity to that word.

We also noticed that in one of the drops, #1188, there was mention of an assignment for us to examine NP and create a profile. That drop contained the “Narrative”, “5+1” number pattern, and a reference to “eyes only.”

END PART TWO….[but there’s more]

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

DIG INTO COUNTDOWN - REVIVING OF PAST Q ELEMENTS

“The Eyes Have It”

PART THREE

As noted in Part One, I was interested in “Eyes Only” from #1188.

I did a search on “eyes only” - Several possible meanings turned up. The following are the more interesting ones, although there are others.

1. is jargon in the intelligence milieu which indicates a document or bit of data is restricted to certain cleared people to view it with their eyes only - no copies.

2. There is a James Bond movie:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082398/

Storyline

After disposing of a familiar looking face, Bond is sent to recover a communication device, known as an ATAC, which went down with a British Spy ship as it sunk. Bond must hurry though, as the Russians are also out for this device. On his travels, he also meets Melina Havelock, whose parents were brutally murdered. Bond also encounters both Aristotle Kristatos and Milos Colombo. Each of them are accusing the other of having links with with the Russians. Bond must team up with Melina, solve who the true ally is and find the ATAC before it’s too late.

Plot summaries and synopsis can be found here, spoilers and all:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082398/plotsummary?ref_=tt_stry_pl

We saw the theme of high tech/ IT crop up in the previous Parts of this series wrt NP. This movie could perhaps provide material for possible interpretation of Q material.

3.Another possibility is a book by Fern Michaels, “Eyes Only” which is the 24th in the “Sisterhood” series.

“Lush, exclusive Spyder Island is home to many of the world’s billionaires. Years ago, Gretchen Spyder, daughter of the island’s namesake, gave her twin babies up for legal adoption. Now Gretchen and her father are trying to get them back. The twins’ adoptive parents are a loving but poor couple, completely outgunned by the Spyders’ wealth. Their only hope lies with Myra Rutledge and her formidable Sisterhood, who are as ready as ever to fight the good fight. But nestled among the lavish mansions and immaculate landscaping of Spyder Island is a sinister enemy. And in a case that’s far more twisted than it first appeared, the ingenuity, courage, and friendship of the Sisterhood will be tested as never before. “

At first I didn’t think this would be interesting to us at all.... but WAIT!
The book mentions Islands owned by billionaires. Such kinds of islands do figure in our researches here. The book also has a theme of a mother giving up her babies and many of us know where that would be headed in pedo world. In this page turner, the implication seems to be, because the Spyder woman has her sisterhood to turn to, then the babies will be somehow retrieved.

But the question surfaced, does Nancy Pelosi own an island?

Almost.

Here is a quote from a Michelle Malkin 2010 article:

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/08/18/pelosi-and-the-treasure-island-land-grab/

“Pelosi was speaking at a ceremony celebrating the Treasure Island Deal:”

“The deal has been signed to transfer man-made Treasure Island in the middle of San Francisco Bay from the Navy to San Francisco.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Mayor Gavin Newsom and Navy Secretary Ray Mabus signed the transfer agreement on Tuesday. In includes a section of neighboring Yerba Buena Island.”

[Note: I’m wondering where DIFI is in all this - where is HER hand??? Was she involved at all? We see her relative Gavin Newsom was in attendance....Is he DIFI’s proxy thrust out hand?]

“Payments to the Navy could rise to $105 million, funded by private companies and revenue from developing the former Navy base into a model 21st century neighborhood.”

[Why am I not believing this “Payments to the Navy” part? I don’t know anything about this, but I’m smelling a Derp State slush fund/ kick back scheme here. But I could be wrong. AND YIKES! “model 21st century neighborhood”.... can you say “Agenda 21?” I have not researched that, but it sure does smell like a possibility to rule out!]

Michelle Malkin has written extensively about all of this at the above link. I had not heard of this deal before. Probably you California FReeQs will know more about it.

For more information here is another link to the Malkin article with commentary from FReepers:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2573026/posts

The Hill published an article about it before the deal was consummated in this 2009 article:
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/52701-pelosi-has-her-eye-on-treasure-island

Moving on.

#1379 could conceivably tie in with some of this “5+1”, “Narrative,” and some facets of high tech/ IT assets surrounding NP. Honestly, I’m just presenting pieces here. I sense connections, but am not able to really put my finger on the “why” of the pattern in all cases].

The drop was named by anons as “Nancy Pelosi and Jack Dorsey Meeting in San Francisco.” It was given May 16, 2018.

A visual of two articles was posted by an anon with titles “Google betrays anti-Breitbart bias with ‘lying’ home assistant answer,” and “Twitter officially admits to ‘shadowbanning’ users in all but name”

In this instance, there IS a “5” in a kill box, but not by itself:

[5.2]
[NP 8:11 “Speaker [xxxxxxx] your protection against…”]
[JD 8:13 “[ABC] has an interest in this…”]
[NP 8:14 “——————— Pier 39…”]
Q

What is that “5.2?” In the kill box? What is the “.2?” The last line hints at an audio or video counter mark, “8:14” where something very significant is said regarding “Pier 39.”

Could that be another place where pallets of high tech goodies were either brought in or sent out? I Don’t Know.

4. “Eyes Only “ - Could be Q’s quirky endearing way of referring to “5 eyes.”