Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes

Well she’s exempt because she’s a political idiot savant....

Cartoon character meme girl.

I call her Gumby.


435 posted on 01/30/2019 9:03:07 PM PST by Califreak (If Obama had been treated like Trump the US would have been burnt down before Inauguration Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: Califreak; ransomnote; TEXOKIE; generally; bagster; defconw; JockoManning; All
Well, I don't really understand why we should want to sign any agreement with socialist, criminal, communist governments. Thus I began to research USMCA. Color me SKEPTICAL.

First red flag was Lighthizer of the CFR negotiator of deal. Trumps economic team is not exactly anti-NWO. President of CFR-Haas is on board with the deal. Not building my confidence.

So I started searching. Here's an excerpt and link to entire article:

Just as Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller both championed NAFTA, so Richard N. Haass, the current President of the Council on Foreign Relations, endorses the proposed USMCA.

In an October 2 tweet, Haass stated: USMCA is NAFTA plus TPP plus a few tweaks. Whatever…if @real Donald Trump and the Congress are now prepared to embrace a pro-trade agenda, it is all to the good. Ideally, US participation in TPP by another name would be next; failing that, a US-Japan FTA would be second best.

And what else would we expect from an agreement negotiated by Robert Lighthizer? The U.S. Trade Representative (left) is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, which has long championed Internationalist-run world government. When tapped by Trump, Lighthizer was a partner at a CFR corporate-member law firm.

http://www.nordskogpublishing.com/the-new-nafta-power-grab/

One of the videos that I watched noted that it was stipulated that Mexico gets to keep control of it's Energy Resources. USA and Canada are moving toward a regional consortium. That does NOT bode well in my opinion!

Any one visiting the forbidden city? Can we get the anons to look at this while we are in a Q drop Drought? This may need some serious opposition to get changes made.

487 posted on 01/31/2019 1:54:10 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson