Replies

Why would you say that, Jacky Soi?

You’ve said nothing but the opposite the whole way through.

#Amazing

I have a theory. You made that post to troll us into co-signing the “2 weeks from Friday” thing so you CAN say “I told you so”, and “look at those kooks” when it doesn’t happen.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MotherOfDragons: Absolutely correct, as usual, Bagster.

(excerpt of Soi post, 8/25/2018)
“This thread is about 20 really active people, it’s no destined to effect anything. It’s for watching and decoding. Nothing wrong with that, but it sort of shoots the “team” thing. We’re not a factor in what’s going on, sadly. We can’t even influence the rest of Free Republic.”

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3681095/posts?page=1466#1466

~~~

MotherOfDragons: Why would he spend time on a thread with 20 people doing nothing of relevance? Why would he come back after his grand thread OPUS?

(Soi OPUS Excerpt 9/7/2018)
“I’ve decided to leave the Qanon perennial thread, as ransomnote and others have requested.
The level of acrimony that my posts generate is too high, it was not my intention to be a disruptive force, but that is how a lot of the most active people on this thread view me.

So, it’s done. I’m outta here.”

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3685207/posts?page=906#906

~~~

MotherOfDragons: Why is his self-described “disruptive” effect on our threads okay now? He even notes a lot of us felt that way about his presence. He returned, even after wandering the forum, posting on many threads that we’re intolerant, won’t listen, rude etc.?

Two Soi examples of MANY:
“Q believers found this analysis incredibly irritating, and I eventually chose self-exile from their threads to avoid then endless stream of rude invective and insults directed at me from the believers.”

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3696813/posts?page=35#35

“I was asked to leave the Q boards by Ransomnote, who is the organizer of them, and harassed with all sorts of vile personal attacks by others there, merely for questioning things on the Q board, and posting some hard facts. So, either we can talk about stuff here, or we can talk about stuff there.”

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3701440/posts?page=152#152

~~~

MotherOfDragons:

Why ELSE would he keep coming back, even though he doesn’t like our content and thinks we’re rude. Even though Jim Rob said: “If you don’t like the subject or topic of the thread to the point you become abusive or trollish, stay off it.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3713751/posts

~~~~

MotherOfDragons: What reason does he have to cling to our thread, which he claims is irrelevant, attended by 20 “rude” people, and covering topic he believes false?

You’ve been faithfully debunking him for months. ThankQ for keeping the truth front and center.

In the spirit of the GREAT AWAKENING, Lemme take a crack at decode your post, Mother of Dragons. After all, We have more than we know.

Why would he spend time on a thread with 20 people doing nothing of relevance? Why would he come back after his grand thread OPUS?

Besides having a healthy dose of the Jerome Corsi/LS "smartest person in the room" syndrome, I think Jacky boy is attracted to our positivity and camaraderie. That's not easy to find on the internet, and not just lately beyond the trees. And I suspect there's a dose of professional derp thrown in there.

Even derps are susceptible to "Stockholm Syndrome".

Pro-tip to the Mongolian derp farm: You really do need to rotate your operative's assignments to prevent this from habbening. Maybe every two months or so?

The level of acrimony that my posts generate is too high, it was not my intention to be a disruptive force, but that is how a lot of the most active people on this thread view me.

While what the soya says is completely accurate, he at least is helpful in Bagster Unlimited's meme production.

MotherOfDragons: What reason does he have to cling to our thread, which he claims is irrelevant, attended by 20 “rude” people, and covering a topic he believes false?

In summation. While he hates what we stand for (Qanon), he loves us, and who can blame him. We are very lovable (especially me).

#SoyaBoya

#RudeBoy

(there is a secret song just for Blu hidden somewhere in this post/See if you can find it).

Bagster

I'm here because I'm interested in the topic, just like everyone else, and this is the place to discuss it.

I've changed some of my thinking since last August on Q. and on other things too. I try to change my views as more evidence comes forward. One of those was my self-exile, which I ended.

Since coming back I have tried to not get into pissing contests with people. In general I just ignore the insults tossed my way. Which there are a few of, mostly by the same people over and over, and some of which I have to admit are humorous.

I try to keep providing data on things that are Q-related: like Mueller's witch hunt, Huber's inactivity, etc.

Most of my posts are about things going on in the news, related to the Deep State Coup and the Qteam response (or lack of response)

The thing is: I don't write long posts deconstructing your motivations, I don't figure out insulting names for others here and post them one after another.

You keep writing about me, like this long post. OK, fine. I don't have a big problem with it, but I'm not trying to make Jack Black a topic here. I'm more interested in Mueller, Ohr, Page, Wikileaks, Stone etc.

But please so not think you can write about me and have your mis-characterizations go unchalleneged. That's passive-aggressive behavior, and I don't reward that.

It's amusing the you quote me, but you are clipping them pretty short, losing the context. Here, let me add the longer quites (the full context for the quotes you've linked)

The first quote was my response to the repeated claims that I was a paid agitator.

That's kind of paranoid isn't it? Or are you going with the theory that I was "seeded" here in 1998 like a sleeper agent and have been biding my time pretending to be a conservative just so I can sow my moderately skeptical view of Q?
You seem to have delusions of grandeur, this FR thread is at the end of the day just a FR thread.
It's not like its influencing the world at large, hell we're not even getting many Freepers to visit it, in part because a few people here act like it's their own private board and drive out anyone with views different from their own. (...sadly, that still happening, maybe worse now than in August when I wrote this).
The high points for FR activism include the Clinton impeachment, the debunking of the Swift Boat claims of John Kerry, the debunking of Dan Rather's claims about Bush, and the original Tea Party movement culminating in a huge march on Washington.

This thread is about 20 really active people, it's no destined to effect anything. It's for watching and decoding. Nothing wrong with that, but it sort of shoots the "team" thing. We're not a factor in what's going on, sadly. We can't even influence the rest of Free Republic.
The thing is eventually we're gonna know, one way or the other. I laid out a pretty simple little list. If those things happen, one after a another, will it will be interesting to see what you say if that happens.

A while ago someone did count the number of posters on the thread and it was about 120, if I remember correctly, with an average of six per day per poster. So maybe this thread has gained more of audience since August. Congratulations!

Funny, you and Bagster and MoD loving going to my home page, but you never quote the current stuff, right at the top of the page. It's what I referenced in the above quote. The simple tests that will tell us if the Q plan is working or not.

You know not all plans work, and even if Q is a group of DIA employees (is that the theory still?) they might lose, and the plan fail. So, that's why I laid out my test last August:

Is Q real?
Is the plan working?
Here is my future checklist (compiled and presented to the "ransomnote Qanon thread" in August 2018) of items which tend to indicate that the plan isn't working.
Evaluation current as of today.
✔ - event happened, indications "the plan" is failing
✖ - event did not happen, tends to indicate "the plan" is working
no check or X - pending, could still go either way

✔ There are no Huber indictments before the election
✔There are no Huber indictments before the 2019 Congress in sworn in
✔ There are no indictments stemming from the IG Report on the Hillary email investigation
✔ The GOP lose control of the House
✖ The GOP lose control of the Senate
Donald Trump Jr. is indicted by Mueller
✔ Other Trump associates are indicted by Mueller
Roger Stone indicted 1/25/19
Trump is indicted by Mueller
Trump is impeached
Trump is convicted in the Senate and removed
Trump is convicted by a jury of Mueller's charges

If we start rolling down that list with more and more of those events happening and still no counter-action then we have to assume that either "the plan" has failed, or that the people telling us to "trust the plan" were simply wrong.
Alternately seeing any of the major figures in the Deep State Coup arrested would be wonderful, not to mention whoever is on the 40,000 sealed indictments.

Failed Q Predictions (so far):

✖ the 54,000 sealed indictments being the most infamous. Still, to date, no activity on those.
✖ mass round up and arrests by Marines.
✖ martial law
✖ American citizens sent to GITMO
✖ national guard deployments in major cities to prevent rioting
✖ arrest of Hillary
✖ "#ReleaseTheTapes of the Hillary pedo videos
✖ "Red October"
✖ "MOAB"
✖ "suicide weekend"
✖ Trust Sessions! (Sessions fired).
✖ WE WILL PROTECT THE VOTE #2405 - 11/4/18
>Yes, midterms are safe. #1197 - 4/19/18
actual: massive vote fraud in Florida, Georgia and Arizona and 8 seats flipped in California after election night.