I'm here because I'm interested in the topic, just like everyone else, and this is the place to discuss it.
I've changed some of my thinking since last August on Q. and on other things too. I try to change my views as more evidence comes forward. One of those was my self-exile, which I ended.
Since coming back I have tried to not get into pissing contests with people. In general I just ignore the insults tossed my way. Which there are a few of, mostly by the same people over and over, and some of which I have to admit are humorous.
I try to keep providing data on things that are Q-related: like Mueller's witch hunt, Huber's inactivity, etc.
Most of my posts are about things going on in the news, related to the Deep State Coup and the Qteam response (or lack of response)
The thing is: I don't write long posts deconstructing your motivations, I don't figure out insulting names for others here and post them one after another.
You keep writing about me, like this long post. OK, fine. I don't have a big problem with it, but I'm not trying to make Jack Black a topic here. I'm more interested in Mueller, Ohr, Page, Wikileaks, Stone etc.
But please so not think you can write about me and have your mis-characterizations go unchalleneged. That's passive-aggressive behavior, and I don't reward that.
It's amusing the you quote me, but you are clipping them pretty short, losing the context. Here, let me add the longer quites (the full context for the quotes you've linked)
The first quote was my response to the repeated claims that I was a paid agitator.
That's kind of paranoid isn't it? Or are you going with the theory that I was "seeded" here in 1998 like a sleeper agent and have been biding my time pretending to be a conservative just so I can sow my moderately skeptical view of Q? You seem to have delusions of grandeur, this FR thread is at the end of the day just a FR thread.
It's not like its influencing the world at large, hell we're not even getting many Freepers to visit it, in part because a few people here act like it's their own private board and drive out anyone with views different from their own. (...sadly, that still happening, maybe worse now than in August when I wrote this).
The high points for FR activism include the Clinton impeachment, the debunking of the Swift Boat claims of John Kerry, the debunking of Dan Rather's claims about Bush, and the original Tea Party movement culminating in a huge march on Washington.
This thread is about 20 really active people, it's no destined to effect anything. It's for watching and decoding. Nothing wrong with that, but it sort of shoots the "team" thing. We're not a factor in what's going on, sadly. We can't even influence the rest of Free Republic.
The thing is eventually we're gonna know, one way or the other. I laid out a pretty simple little list. If those things happen, one after a another, will it will be interesting to see what you say if that happens.
A while ago someone did count the number of posters on the thread and it was about 120, if I remember correctly, with an average of six per day per poster. So maybe this thread has gained more of audience since August. Congratulations!
Funny, you and Bagster and MoD loving going to my home page, but you never quote the current stuff, right at the top of the page. It's what I referenced in the above quote. The simple tests that will tell us if the Q plan is working or not.
You know not all plans work, and even if Q is a group of DIA employees (is that the theory still?) they might lose, and the plan fail. So, that's why I laid out my test last August:
| Is Q real? Is the plan working? Here is my future checklist (compiled and presented to the "ransomnote Qanon thread" in August 2018) of items which tend to indicate that the plan isn't working. Evaluation current as of today. ✔ - event happened, indications "the plan" is failing
✖ - event did not happen, tends to indicate "the plan" is working
no check or X - pending, could still go either way
- ✔ There are no Huber indictments before the election
- ✔There are no Huber indictments before the 2019 Congress in sworn in
- ✔ There are no indictments stemming from the IG Report on the Hillary email investigation
- ✔ The GOP lose control of the House
- ✖ The GOP lose control of the Senate
- Donald Trump Jr. is indicted by Mueller
- ✔ Other Trump associates are indicted by Mueller
Roger Stone indicted 1/25/19 - Trump is indicted by Mueller
- Trump is impeached
- Trump is convicted in the Senate and removed
- Trump is convicted by a jury of Mueller's charges
If we start rolling down that list with more and more of those events happening and still no counter-action then we have to assume that either "the plan" has failed, or that the people telling us to "trust the plan" were simply wrong. Alternately seeing any of the major figures in the Deep State Coup arrested would be wonderful, not to mention whoever is on the 40,000 sealed indictments.
Failed Q Predictions (so far):
- ✖ the 54,000 sealed indictments being the most infamous. Still, to date, no activity on those.
- ✖ mass round up and arrests by Marines.
- ✖ martial law
- ✖ American citizens sent to GITMO
- ✖ national guard deployments in major cities to prevent rioting
- ✖ arrest of Hillary
- ✖ "#ReleaseTheTapes of the Hillary pedo videos
- ✖ "Red October"
- ✖ "MOAB"
- ✖ "suicide weekend"
- ✖ Trust Sessions! (Sessions fired).
- ✖ WE WILL PROTECT THE VOTE #2405 - 11/4/18
>Yes, midterms are safe. #1197 - 4/19/18
actual: massive vote fraud in Florida, Georgia and Arizona and 8 seats flipped in California after election night.
|
my moderately skeptical view of Q? You're kidding right?
There's nothing "moderately skeptical" about your view of Q, derpo.
And you know it.
You have a bad problem with honesty. Which is what I find the most troubling about you. I never have liked two-faced posers. I take it as a personal insult when people think I'm stupit enough to believe obvious lies.
I'm here because I'm interested in the topic, just like everyone else, and this is the place to discuss it.
The "topic", as you call it, here is Qanon research. You don't believe Q is a thing, in fact you think it's a "larp" or something. You would be better served among your own kind out beyond the trees.
We red pill people here. You seek to blue pill them. The two ideas are mortal enemies. You have to understand that, its a very simple concept.
Just about everything you post seeks to put a damper on THE PLAN and what Trump is trying to accomplish. Surely you can see why I, and others, may think you are up to shenanigans. Why else would you try to so hard to convince us so aggressively that we are off base and wrong, that Q is fake, and that nothing's happening.
Be like the other "non-believers" out beyond the trees and spew your defeatism out there among your surrender-monkey peers.
And as far as name-calling goes, Jacky, I have been extraordinarily (for me) kind and gentle with you. I really don't have nice things to say about people that hurt my country and my children's future. And that is what I think people are doing, who, either out of ignorance or pride, not only don't support Trump's (with Q as his messenger) efforts to save America and the world, but actively work against them.
That would be you, Soya.
You have nothing to offer but negativity. You are capable of doing good, productive works, but you just can't see what's really going on here. Until you do, nothing you say means a thing. Its all just you kvetching about yourself and whining about how everybody's mean to you.
a.) Get over yourself.
b.) Take the red pill.
c.) Get on team Trump. Win or lose, he is us and we are him. He (they) needs all the soldiers he can muster. And make no mistake, we are soldiers of a sort. Each and every one of us. Posters and lurkers alike.
d.) Stop whining.
p.s. This post was directed at you AND the general populace as a reminder of why we're here and of those who seek to diminish our efforts.
Cheers.
Bagster
