[odawg]

Looks to me like that interpretation is a bit forced.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Maybe it was more like a hair barette than a tiara/crown.

[sparklite2]

Works for me. Although I wouldn’t call it a tiara.

---

There is a hole in the rounded end of the tiara, where a cord was threaded to tie it at the back of the head

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Just a little bit forced, isn’t it?

I think it looks a lot more like a letter opener.

Who knew men were wearing womens’ accoutrements 45,000 years ago?Those guys were sure woke. Based on this find, it is obvious the gals didn’t need a #MeToo movement.

[SkyDancer]

No doubt someone from Gillette interpreted that.

[neverevergiveup]

“Looks to me like that interpretation is a bit forced.”

I know.. It could be an early guitar capo.

[Starboard]

Looks to me like that interpretation is a bit forced.

***************

That’s how you keep the grant money coming in. Gotta produce something of interest don’t you know. Any ‘artifact’ will do.

[PistolPaknMama]

Looks to me like that interpretation is a bit forced.

I was thinking it could as easily be a handle of some sort. Tie it to a "bucket" or pouch of water to make carrying easier. The headband seems impractical 'cause it would keep slipping down from sweat. Maybe you could pull your hair back and tie the headband string at the nape of your neck.