Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes

857 posted on 01/19/2019 9:18:53 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies ]



859 posted on 01/19/2019 9:21:31 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

Thanks for bringing the images over.


864 posted on 01/19/2019 9:36:15 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

Is it against law or protocols for any POTUS to interview potential Supreme Court replacements, any time he chooses, in any event?

For instance, I have been assuming Trump was and is doing the same thing, particularly given the long list of candidates he delivered to the public, during his campaign.

Yes, it’s true that interviewing someone in a clandestine manner for a SCJ, is Not a good look to be discovered, when a SC Justice passes away in a curiously remote location, but, Scalia elected to go on this lodge trip, apparently independent of any known coercion.

Is this yet unproven “conclusion” something from Q, or is it from some zealous conspiracy hunters flogging a fresh news release to whip up some cray cray? ???


876 posted on 01/19/2019 11:48:51 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson