This I question. HRC and Obama were more likely on the side of Venezuela and the others but had to be sneaky. Something brought the commies into power but I doubt it was due to isolation.
*******************************************************************************
Maybe or maybe not. It certainly follows typical tactics. Financial Pressure, and exploiting internal divisions to bring “our guy” to power.
No honor among these thieves. If the despot in power is not “our” guy methods are employed to get rid of that guy, and get a different one.
Or if “our guy” gets ideas of his own-can be dangerous to his rule. Influential USA interests in Venezuela Oil would very much like to be back in Venezuela.
Topples of governments often are related to Corporate Influence, and I don’t have any knowledge of CF rejecting “donations” in their pay to play schemes-So, maybe or maybe not.
Marc Rich, Clintons, and Kaddafi were involved with smuggling oil when sanctions were on Libya. Then HRC is involved with pardon for Rich, and more recently toppling Kaddafi. So it just depends.
Financial warfare is real. Big countries do it. It often results in regime change-no boots on the ground needed-maybe a few CIA guys exploiting existing divisions, and maybe even arming the opposition.
Likely a contributing factor. Financial screws/isolation not the only arrow in the quiver.
#GreedBeforeIdeology
It may be that Clinton, Ozama, Maduro, all agreed to drive the people to starvation. It’s what commies do! All the while enriching themselves in the process. Pay to play.