Posted on 01/04/2019 10:13:08 PM PST by ransomnote
Alright, who told?
*grrrrrrr*
#GniteForRealThisTime
Bagster
“Amy Coney Barrett?”********************Believe she is a tough conservative
Nerds have found much of what you ask. Ill go back several breads and see if I can hunt down the info
Yep!
She’s outstanding. I thought she’d be better than Judge K. before he was appointed by in hindsight she’d never have withstood the smear campaign they’d have waged. Now, with precedent of Doctored Ford, the DEMs can slime all they want and it won’t work (53-47)
Thanks, 19!
Also, my own impression was that Soros was never much enthralled with Hillary Clinton, as he was hot for other gangsters.
She had a deficit.
Money was one thing, but POWER was her First and only insatiable appetite, and I believe Soros therefore couldn’t trust her to stay in line for solely money. She probably would have tried to UNSEAT Soros.
Honestly, Hillary was tight with money, but looking at her she was no spendthrift on luxury, or even shampoo or bath soap. She wanted money only for obtaining power, expanding it and keeping it. Cabal Rules— by buying and selling people and lives. Soros was buying and selling whole countries.
Hillary was edging in on him. Benghazi, Lybia, Arms Dealing...
The reason she has clearly gone off her rocker is Trump has cut off her Funding Supply and frozen her Pots of Gold. Things are not going her way so easily, for some time now.
She’s in a real Mood about it. It’s affecting her health, evidently.
I will give you that border patrol does but it is so unsightly.
When will the public discover that Ted Cruz was also illegally SURV (pre_POTUS_R nomination)?
C_A ‘illegal’ SURV > members of Congress?
C_A ‘illegal’ SURV > members of the Press?
C_A ‘illegal’ SURV > SENATE INTEL COMM?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/10/cia-senate-investigation-constitutional-crisis-daniel-jones
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/01/world/senate-intelligence-commitee-cia-interrogation-report.html
Who ordered the SURV?
What justification was provided to AUTH SURV of ELECTED OFFICIALS?
SURV fall under scope of FISA warrant or internal to Dept or outsourced to FVEY?
Reality check - friend or foe, we all spy on each other?
Should we be spying on ourselves?
Should we be tasking others to spy on ourselves in order to avoid U.S. law?
Was FVEY established & designed by the INTEL COMM as a backchannel SURV apparatus to avoid domestic laws triggers and Congressional/Senate oversight?
What keylogs exist to monitor FVEY intel collection?
What ability do former GOV officials have re: ability to access C_LEVEL FVEY offshore data?
How did HRC gain access to highest CLAS SAPs (closed system access) and able to transfer to remote/home server?
(Q above should scare every single American)
How did CHINA locate primary C_A assets within CHINA [187]?
Money buys POWER.
No punishment [Brennan] by HUSSEIN ADMIN re: SURV of Senate etc?
Logical thinking, why?
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article24770296.html
Justice Dept declines to pursue?
Fake News media limits exposure to public?
When did @Snowden breach NSA & PUBLICLY RELEASE (CRIPPLE) INTEL GATHERING ABILITY (NSA)?
NSA targeted?
Where did @Snowden work prior to NSA contractor ACCEPT?
What SENIOR LEVEL GOV/C_A OFFICIAL rec @Snowden for NSA contractor OFF/TAR position?
Post public release of CLAS NSA PRO > U1?
Where is @Snowden today?
What country was involved in U1?
If real target country was VENEZUELA or ECUADOR - why didn’t @Snowden take a direct flight from Hong Kong to those locations?
How many direct flights run daily from HK to V&E?
If @Snowden was C_A/NSA would he not understand (simple logic) going public PRIOR TO END DESTINATION SAFETY would ‘LIMIT’ ACTIVE PASSPORT TRAVEL ABILITY due to block_DEREG?
WHY WOULDN’T @Snowden PUBLICLY RELEASE INFO AFTER HE ALREADY WAS SAFELY AT FINAL DESTINATION?
Why then would @Snowden route through RUSSIA?
Was RUSSIA final destination?
Was RUSSIA true destination?
Could @Snowden be seen releasing CLAS programs/intel FROM INSIDE OF RUSSIA?
What role did BRENNAN PLAY in the @Snowden leaks re: NSA?
What was BRENNAN’s background re: SAUDI ARABIA?
Does the C_A hold blackmail on political leaders?
Does the C_A protect those who protect them?
Why are ex C_A contractors running for office?
How many ex C_A contractors are currently in office?
Hello, [AS].
Once an agent, always an agent.
Q
I found the RR experience in the General leak case to be quite illuminating ... he fought DoJ and Obama WH and persevered. The same principals he identified are the same for sustaining a prosecution of HRC. I’ve also wondered, is the Mule that dumb? Regardless of where things end up, it’s clearly + continues to be the greatest sting in the history of the earth. And the “upstream collection” stuff in recent post continues that line of thinking - all the derps playing as if the rules & source of power hadn’t changed. Oh the phone calls and comms between the players that have been trek’d all this time. It is truly amazing + mindblowing to contemplate when you factor in the MILINT aspects of things; glorious actually ;)
Ouch that is harsh. :-)
so curious. It seems POTUS holds (near) ALL the cards at this point. Oh and Sessions is/was asleep ;)
Two different tiers of medical care? Sort of like two different tiers of justice? Not for long! MAGA!
Could “they” keep RBG alive for legal purposes? In other words, keep her body in a living state after the cancer has killed her in order to delay her SC replacement?
OMG - I wondered about this before - go back to Fusion GPS and the way FISA collection used to be before Rogers caught on at no such agency. So ... Ted was a russian pawn + bot, too, huh? Or one of is staffers, too? What a coincidence!
Things that make ya go hmmmmmmmm!
seems we’re already close to that now ... does she even appear in session anymore? Is she attending by phone? Nobody seems to know or say. I believe somebody looked into this before and it is a requirement that she be attending & even the “phone” call-in scenario is not in line with the law or how the law should be (since we’re talking operational aspects of SCOTUS). It’s been “Weekend at Ginsberg’s” for some time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.