"SEALED PROCEEDINGS" may be a lot more accurate.
StormWatchr on twitter: "5.) Since day 1, we have never claimed to know what this [these] numbers represent. We may have offered opinions at time, but after a year, we still don't know what these numbers represent."
@WMerthon on twitter purports a fairly thorough analysis of the whole issue & makes plenty of sobering points. I still think there is something very dramatic and unusual re the sealed "proceedings," regardless of what folks like @WMerthon assert.
But it may be some time before the solid stuff falls out of the ether's with any clarity.