Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

“4. It’s the first interstellar object we’ve managed to observe”

Seriously? Really?

There is something being left out of that statement that would make it true.


3 posted on 12/29/2018 7:53:57 AM PST by NotQuiteCricket (I hate when green goes red and then black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NotQuiteCricket

“...orbiting within our solar system”. (Which may or may not be true.)


7 posted on 12/29/2018 7:57:42 AM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: NotQuiteCricket
“4. It’s the first interstellar object we’ve managed to observe”

Seriously? Really?

There is something being left out of that statement that would make it true.

Other than gas clouds illuminated by stars and black holes, which are only "observable" by their gravitational influence and occasional gravity waves. I suppose he should have said "discrete object not gravitationally bound to a particular star". It certainly appears to be gravitationally bound to the Milky Way. There are stars that are not. Of those stars about 6/7's have been ejected by interaction with other stars, and one-seventh appear to be intergalactic visitors.

17 posted on 12/29/2018 8:06:14 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Schumer delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: NotQuiteCricket

Japan just landed probes on another asteroid and there are photos of others.


33 posted on 12/29/2018 9:01:38 AM PST by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson