The thing I would like to see analyzed is: whether attempting to manufacture evidence of a crime, or for the “appearance” of a crime, in order to overthrow an election, would itself be a crime.
Because it appears to me that is exactly what they admitted doing.
Wondering if anyone has seen or can provide some decent legal analysis on this.
Because it appears to me that is exactly what they admitted doing.
Wondering if anyone has seen or can provide some decent legal analysis on this.
Me too, I would like to see that investigated.
Mueller has indicted a number of people on "Conspiracy to defraud the US Government" where his definition of "defraud" is to interfere with the proper functioning of the government in some way. So, for instance, the Russians were charged with this because the FEC has the proper function of regulating campaign spending and the Russians (Troll Farm) didn't file the appropriate forms.
So, using this same logic all these Obama/Clinton Deep State types are guilty of "Conspiracy to Defraud the US Government" because lawful change of leadership is a prime function of the entire election process, and they conspired to prevent or interfere with it.
We need a good Mueller to counter the bad Mueller. For a while many hoped it was Huber. That hope seems to be a false one though, so we still need a champion.
“whether attempting to manufacture evidence of a crime, or for the “appearance” of a crime, in order to overthrow an election, would itself be a crime.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~
well, JF’n and Ohumma could be jailed for this offense..JF’n for trying to influence Iran after the election, and Ohumma for flying about before and after DJT spoke with world leaders...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/953