Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Disestablishmentarian
The thing I would like to see analyzed is: whether attempting to manufacture evidence of a crime, or for the “appearance” of a crime, in order to overthrow an election, would itself be a crime.

Because it appears to me that is exactly what they admitted doing.

Wondering if anyone has seen or can provide some decent legal analysis on this.

Me too, I would like to see that investigated.

Mueller has indicted a number of people on "Conspiracy to defraud the US Government" where his definition of "defraud" is to interfere with the proper functioning of the government in some way. So, for instance, the Russians were charged with this because the FEC has the proper function of regulating campaign spending and the Russians (Troll Farm) didn't file the appropriate forms.

So, using this same logic all these Obama/Clinton Deep State types are guilty of "Conspiracy to Defraud the US Government" because lawful change of leadership is a prime function of the entire election process, and they conspired to prevent or interfere with it.

We need a good Mueller to counter the bad Mueller. For a while many hoped it was Huber. That hope seems to be a false one though, so we still need a champion.

1,845 posted on 12/26/2018 1:54:19 PM PST by Jack Black ("If you believe in things that you don't understand then you suffer" - "Superstition",Stevie Wonder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1838 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black
We need a good Mueller to counter the bad Mueller. For a while many hoped it was Huber. That hope seems to be a false one though, so we still need a champion.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Jack, I took a peak at some non-Q threads, so I know in that alternate world what you say is true.

But it is far from true on the Q thread.

I don't want to relitigate the whole argument, but I just do not understand the underlying theory of those who think Trump is surrounded by incompetents and/or traitors, and is helpless in the face of all this opposition.

I just do not see it that way. I see a man who is obviously a genius by virtue of rising to the top in profession after profession (business, entertainment, politics); who has vanquished every opponent who has faced him directly; who played the media like a fiddle in order to accomplish the impossible of becoming President in his first election ever ... and so on.

Yet many good FReepers seem to think he is ignorant, hamstrung by deep state and outmatched?

To me, thinking that requires a much bigger gulp of Kool-Aid than anything we discuss in Q world.

1,851 posted on 12/26/2018 2:04:46 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1845 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
For a while many hoped it was Huber. That hope seems to be a false one though, so we still need a champion.

Not just a lie, but a stupid lie.

Stop repeating lies.

Bagster


1,871 posted on 12/26/2018 4:07:36 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1845 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson