Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bayard
He would have been allowed in a conceivable case, Sacramental confession covers forgiveness of sins and he would have had to have a valid marriage exchange of vows.

Not per Roman Catholicism....they would have had to remain abstinent so as not to "commit adultery".

The hyjinks Rome goes to in their dogmas.

110 posted on 12/15/2018 8:22:02 AM PST by ealgeone (SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE! However, Roman Catholicism has, does, and will change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone

Did you forget that in David’s case Bethsheba’s husband was dead?

Matrimony is only for life, not forever. So it is perfectly possible for David to have had a valid exchange in the Catholic Church.


112 posted on 12/15/2018 8:24:26 AM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: ealgeone

Please clarify: you think it’s wrong to abstain from sex with the person you’ve been committing adultery with, in order not to repeat the sin of adultery?


129 posted on 12/15/2018 8:48:49 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("Let us commend ourselves, and one another, and our whole life, unto Christ Our God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson