Q Anon: 12/10/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 12/10/18 | FReepers, vanity

[BiggBob]

The fact that you refuse to see what is happening is not the same as nothing as happening, before anything could happen the corrupt players that tried to entrap Trump and cover for Hillary had to be removed.

James Comey, Director – FIRED

Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director - FIRED

Jim Rybicki, Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor – FIRED

James Baker, General Counsel – FIRED

Bill Priestap, Director of Counterintelligence (Strzok’s boss) – Cooperating witness

Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence – FIRED

Lisa Page, Office of General Counsel – FIRED

Mike Kortan, Assistant Director for Public Affairs – FIRED

Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to Comey – FIRED

David Laufman, Chief of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section [NAT SEC - HRC email invest] - FIRED

John Carlin, Assistant Attorney General – Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED

Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General & Acting Attorney General - FIRED

Mary McCord, Acting Assistant Attorney General – Acting Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED

Bruce Ohr, Associate Deputy Attorney General – Demoted 2x - cooperating

Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General - FIRED

Or are you really naive enough to believe that the same idiots that gave Hillary a pass every other time would do something different cause Trump was in office?

See ridicule is our best Weapon.

[StormFlag]

Also this, will there be consequences for Comey?

Comey admits decision to send FBI agents to interview Mike Flynn was not standard

....Asked to describe how two FBI agents ended up at the White House to interview Flynn in January 2017, Comey, speaking to MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace during a forum discussion Sunday, said flatly: “I sent them.”

Comey went on to acknowledge the way the interview was set up – not through the White House counsel’s office but arranged directly with Flynn – was not standard practice. He called it “something I probably wouldn't have done or maybe gotten away with in a more … organized administration.”

RE: JUDGE IN FLYNN CASE ORDERS MUELLER TO TURN OVER INTERVIEW DOCS AFTER BOMBSHELL CLAIM OF FBI PRESSURE

[stars & stripes forever]

RE: UN MIGRATION COMPACT/CANADA

The U.S. will need a northern border wall too.

[bagster]

Noted.

There will be a test.

👨‍🎓

[stars & stripes forever]

makers will be personally liable for sexual harassment claims under a deal reached in Congress

Will it be RETROACTIVE?

[aMorePerfectUnion]

I can't speak decisively, but here's my attempt to answer your questions... and I may be wrong.

Why isn't Huber testifying before Congress?

If his people are testifying, that is sufficient. The less attention placed on Huber, the less he can be attacked by as partisan.

We are almost halfway through Trump's term of office and the landscape hasn't changed and the environment for enacting change has been stolen in this past election.

I would disagree that the landscape hasn't changed. The players on the deep state side have been replaced by good buys in the FBI, DOJ, CIA, etc.

The bad guys think they have just had a victory, in the same way those who take a chess player believe they are succeeding. If you do not know the strategy of the other player and cannot foresee the trap, you do not know what was sacrificed or just lost.

We do not know everything. If we did, the deep state would as well.

These "distractions" indicate to me that the deep state is still in control of things and has set itself up to outlast the remaining time Trump has in office.

Obviously, we want them to believe they are winning, scoring victories, moving the ball their way. We want them to believe they have hope and will prevail.

Frankly, you and I do not see all the plan. Just what was revealed. It is a glimpse.

Hope isn't going to do it.

Of course. I'd encourage you to focus on the big picture, as Q has stated: track personnel changes in the DOJ, FBI, etc, and corporations and world leaders.

Q says the Senate and Supreme Court were the key objectives this go round. They got those. Should we complain that it hasn't been a complete victory yet in every area possible??

No. The objective is to win in the long-term.

At some reasonable point, hope becomes a joke.

Then I guess all that is left for us is to elect Jeb and watch the country continually sinking into socialism and loss of freedom.

Some of us expect actual action and progress towards getting things done.

Some of us are impatient Americans.

There is and has been action. It is not enough for you yet?

Unfortunately, this isn't a 30 minute episode on tv.

Real lives are at stake.

The plan is to undo deep state corruption that stretches back decades.

I think it is unrealistic to think this happens instantly, instead of in stages.

His window of opportunity is in danger of closing shut.

Maybe not. He would certainly realize this.

Maybe this will end on time with the correct outcome and you do not know how yet.

that said, it is a real fight and not just a script that must be followed.

I ask you, WHEN are we going to SEE results beyond this "Q" drop business?

Then you assume I know all of what Q knows. I do not. Neither do you.

I can only point you to Qmap.com, where you can learn of:

executive resignations
human trafficking arrests
sealed indictments
grand juries

Trump remaking trade, alliances, energy, IP, indeed, even world leadership.

That is all you have until the trap closes.

All of this is just my opinion and of course, I could be wrong.

It happened once back in the mid-70s...

[haffast]

Not only does The Shadow know, but choosy moms and dads also choose a 45 over a blunt. :)

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

That certain bill cannot be applied retroactively.
But, a House *rule*, liquidating the fund and forcing the members to pony up, can be passed but highly unlikely.

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks for the info on the first ever Pentagon Audit!

I found it interesting that the structural requirements for govt audits was laid in 90’s,...then, the Dept of Defense, not having complied, was granted in 2010 under Obama, another 7 years to comply. The audit started in 2017, if I read it right.

[KMac1945]

In your response to Uncle Sham
I can’t speak decisively, but here’s my attempt to answer your questions... and I may be wrong.
Why isn’t Huber testifying before Congress?

---

aMPU, Thanks, your post summed it up great!

[Kingwood Kid III]

2610 - Will voter fraud be exposed before January?

No.
2019 push Voter ID based on verifiable intel (fraud).
2020+ safeguarded.
Q
***********
What verifiable intel will be used?
2018 intel of course.

This will probably cause the public to realize that the House results are fraudulent, and bring an outcry for voter reform, and the removal of all who were voted in as the result of voter fraud.

******************************************
I have some questions on this issues, that I’m not sure who to address them to. My line of reasoning goes like this:

1. The voter fraud does not actually occur until the results of the California election are submitted to Congress by California, and accepted by Congress to be validated legal results.

2. Once the California election results HAVE been accepted by the U.S. Government, they are lawful. If events discovered after the fact, prove that voter fraud has taken place, a crime has been committed.

3. The result of the crime is that the voters of California have been disenfranchised. This means that their voting rights have been negated.

4. By allowing the citizens of California to have their voting rights negated, the State of California has essentially declared themselves to outside the laws and the scope of the U.S. government, and the rights granted to U.S. citizens under our constitution.

5. Now comes the “tricky” interpretation of what course the U.S. government has against the State of California. Does that mean that the U.S. government can invalidate the votes for any and all federal office holders from the state of California?

Does this mean that until and unless the State of California cleans up it’s elections process, laws, voter roles, etc. the State of California has forfeited its rights to representation of all federal office holders in the State of California? Thinking long term, does that mean that California from now until the voter fraud is remedied and corrected, loses its U.S. Senators, U.S. Congressmen, etc. representation in the U.S. Government?

If so, does that means that California electoral votes, would be in a state of forfeiture, that the U.S. government would now have a senate with 98 senators? 384 (51 in CA?) House of Representative members (I don’t know how many house members reside in California). Also, if there are 51 House members in California that have now been forfeited due to election fraud, the House now swings Republican again, since the democrats have a 40 member advantage in the coming congressional term. The Republicans again have both the Senate and the House! I have a feeling this might the accurate interpretation of what might happen.

If it does, good luck to democrats trying to win a national presidential elections without being able to having the electoral votes from California in play. This alone would seem to assure a Republican 2020 election victory.

If we look at the reconstruction period following the Civil War, it took some of the former confederate states years to re-enter the Union. The state of California might be in a similar predicament.

Comments?

[MileHi]

Thank you

[Uncle Sham]

With every new administration there has been turnover of staff. Clinton FIRED every U.S. prosecutor when he came into office so the fact that a few folks were fired does not impress me as anything of note. Many people on the list you provided should have been arrested rather than fired or allowed to retire. We have known about the criminal acts perpetrated by Hillary for YEARS yet she is still walking free. How long does it take to make a case and have her tried? For you and me, it's not long at all but for her it seems we need a decade or more. Get real. Sorry, not all of us are buying the time line here. How long does it take to ask ONE question of Obama? Where is your birth certificate? Is that too much to ask? He obviously does not have a legitimate one or we would never have been shown that fake pdf version. Little leagues all over America ask this question ALL THE TIME. What is the problem?

Exposing the deception and lies of the democrats is part of getting the swamp drained. Exposing and FIGHTING election fraud such as that which just took place all over the country is part of draining the swamp. Where is the fight? Is all we are to expect is cute code talk from a letter of the alphabet? If "Q" represents anything in the real world it needs to start happening or the people themselves will take action. Maybe that's what this is really all about. Frustrating the people to the point of reaction, a reaction that they, the deep state are prepared for and anxiously awaiting.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Thanks KM.

[BiggBob]

I didn’t know Trump has access to the triplets from Minority Report and they can prosecute crimes before they happen and without the evidence.
LOL

Anxiously awaiting is one thing chronically whining is quite another.

[LonePalm]

If you would like a classic primer on the subject I would highly recommend Alexander D’Agapeyeff’s famous 1939 work, “Codes and Ciphers - A History of Cryptography”

The term you were looking for is a polyaphabetic cypher. The best known is the Vigenère cipher.

These were state of the art through WW1. Today they can be solved in less time than it takes to set up the decode on the computer. I have done one using pencil and paper.

WWG1WGA

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[Uncle Sham]

Thank you for your detailed response. You have more faith than I do about the veracity and determination of the forces supposedly acting on our behalf. I would much rather you being correct than how I currently feel about all of this.

[Chuckster]

I was, 2150 is past my bedtime at this latitude.

Yep. At this latitude, it has already been dark for seven hours at that time (With eleven more hours to sunrise)

[mairdie]

>>I just throw stuff out there, I’m not married to it.

Aim away from Bagster. He’d marry it, for sure.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: what course the U.S. government has against the State of California. ::

See the “Southern Voting Rights Act”. Fedzilla takes over the State’s right to “run elections as they see fit”.