The police retracted their initial statement blaming Bradford, but it’s still not clear whether he had a gun in his hand when shot. That’s about the only thing that might have given some explanation for the officer’s firing at him.
“The police retracted their initial statement blaming Bradford,...”
That’s because they figured out real quick that their lies couldn’t hold up.
Like with all the other shootings and incidents in the past, I’ll await the official findings before making any judgements. What the media reports, 9 times out of 10, usually turns out to be wrong, and innocent people are tried and convicted in the press.
“but it’s still not clear whether he had a gun in his hand when shot”
But you can be pretty certain that the police put a gun in his hand AFTER he was shot.
MEMO: In a mass shooting situation the police are just as dangerous as the shooter.