Let us slide away from that illogical “fluid dynamics” and oh, so hard to understand “physics” stuff [Math is hard! -Barbie] and due a little diligence (CWIDT?) with Q-drop #2501
++++++++++
Will the release occur prior to scheduled testimony?
List advantages.
Will the release occur post scheduled testimony?
List advantages.
We are asked to list advantages of the two scenario. Let’s have at it, FReeQs!
I’ll start with one for the “early release” column because that has been recently given to us.
An early release will assure a truthful testimony by the witness (”we have it all”).
Who is next? And who will be the recording secretary?
Release after the testimony will facilitate perjury charges if the witness lies.
It will also establish “willing lies”, which we have seen recently are important to certain porculent persons of putrid persuasion.
I hate alliteration!
1. Early Release will negate any attempts to plead a poor memory in questioning. The witness, knowing the documentary evidence could not fall on “I don’t recall.”
2. Early release will negate any pleas to 5A, especially regarding the FISA DECLAS (#9?). The documentary evidence will show that the witness has waived their 5A rights (regarding the PROCESS in question) by their signature on the oath of the affidavit.
“Will the release occur prior to scheduled testimony?
List advantages.
Will the release occur post scheduled testimony?
List advantages.”
I’m leaning toward a combination. Show SOME of the information you have prior to the testimony, leaving out most. This forces them to admit some things but also allows them to get caught in a perjury trap for other things.
Win-win.