[pgkdan]

IF Whitaker has put RM on a leash, is Q inferring that RM is a ‘black hat’ and therefore RR is a ‘black hat’?

This is exactly why, after following Q from nearly the very beginning, I still can't decide that question.

[defconw]

"This is exactly why, after following Q from nearly the very beginning, I still can't decide that question".

Nor can I! This "show" would make Tom Clancy (may he RIP) jealous! More popcorn?

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Dan:

Go back to the Q-drop about the relationship btwx [RR] and RM. Read it again and “decipher” it socratically.

Where in that drop are either one ^said^ to be “clean”?

Socratic criticism allows for the reader to “infer” but that inference is never allowed to be the final conclusion. Future proves the past. One must always return to the bare words to validate any conclusion. When the smoke clears we can validate, not before. Until then...

“Dirty” means dirty.

NO DEALS

[John4.11]

IF Whitaker has put RM on a leash, is Q inferring that RM is a ‘black hat’ and therefore RR is a ‘black hat’?
This is exactly why, after following Q from nearly the very beginning, I still can’t decide that question.
_________________
Hubby and I were just discussing that.... our conclusion?...more popcorn.