[pgkdan]

[D]ec 5 D5

Have we finally gotten the definitive decode for D5? It appears so but with Q you never know. Double and triple meanings abound!

[haffast]

“””Have we finally gotten the definitive decode for D5? It appears so but with Q you never know. Double and triple meanings abound!”””

I was greatly distracted last night during the Q rain. Not caught up. Sorry :(

[TXnMA]

Swordmaker, did you pick up on Q#2494 -- and pkgdan's observation on it?

[D]ec 5 D5

Looks like a worthy addition to your fabulous LexiQon, IMO...

Have a great and safe Thanksgiving weekend!

TXnMA
 

[bagster]

Have we finally gotten the definitive decode for D5?

If you can go back and tie every single D5 mention to December 5 and Huber testifying on that exact date, then maybe so.

I happen to think it's a convenient fit that Q is attributing to the overall or start of the D5 avalanche.

I think it's a stretch to think that Q knew lo those many months ago when Huber would wrap up his investigation and when the House, who he has no control over (one would think) would schedule hearings.

But then, I'm also allergic to clocks, so whadda I know?

#DontBelieveInMagic

Bagster

[ichabod1]

D5 may = D-DAY in history.

[Disestablishmentarian]

[D]ec 5 D5

Have we finally gotten the definitive decode for D5?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

In my opinion, no.

I think Q us just using D5 for emphasis of the Huber testimony, as I DO NOT see how Q could have predicted the date back in May when D5 first appeared.

That being said, I hope the Dec 5 testimony lives up to Q putting the searchlight on it like this.