[bagster]

Have we finally gotten the definitive decode for D5?

If you can go back and tie every single D5 mention to December 5 and Huber testifying on that exact date, then maybe so.

I happen to think it's a convenient fit that Q is attributing to the overall or start of the D5 avalanche.

I think it's a stretch to think that Q knew lo those many months ago when Huber would wrap up his investigation and when the House, who he has no control over (one would think) would schedule hearings.

But then, I'm also allergic to clocks, so whadda I know?

#DontBelieveInMagic

Bagster

[pgkdan]

If you can go back and tie every single D5 mention to December 5 and Huber testifying on that exact date, then maybe so. I happen to think it's a convenient fit that Q is attributing to the overall or start of the D5 avalanche.

If we were talking about anything else I'd agree but where Q is concerned I don't believe in coincidences. How did Q post No Names death time?

But I'm not married to the idea of D5 always having been Dec 5...Q often has double meanings. But if it were always so I wouldn't be surprised.

[ichabod1]

" when Huber would wrap up his investigation and when the House, who he has no control over (one would think) would schedule hearings." They knew they were operating from the milestone of the elections. Huber may have been ready for some time. There is the question of how did they manage to snag that date. Who could have controlled that date? Gowdy? I don't think this is the only meaning for D5. They even referenced the avalanche with "no stopping it" or the bulldozer. Multiple meanings exist, help avoid the filters. On the other hand, it could be historically as big a date as D-day. My take? Well played Q-team, well played. 👏