[generally]

There has been a lot of discussion (mostly by trolls) trying to link Q to Quidam.

Disclosure: I have no memory of Quidam and no stake in either defending him or vilifying him.

What if there is something to it? Not the trollish part, but consider that perhaps Quidam could really have been an insider but was someone who did not have enough info or enough power.

Many believe that the way Trump has identified leakers was to tell something to only the leaker and then see if it leaked to the outside. Perhaps false info was given to Quidam so that he could be ID’d and removed by the DS.

Consider also that Quidam could have been a test run for Q. What if the entire Q operation has been YEARS, even decades, in the planning? It would not surprise me. It makes much more sense than to think such an elaborate plan was cobbled together in less than a year after Trump was sworn in. What if Quidam was an exploration of comms by the Q team? Maybe they learned what worked and what didn’t. Maybe they learned how much influence they would have on FR. (Maybe that’s why Q did NOT choose FR as a primary comms platform.)

Most major ops have dry runs. Why not Q?

Examples: Many people are calling the election fraud this year a dry run for the Ds to learn techniques for stealing the election in 2020. Many people think there have been dry runs of DEW weapons as a prelude to using them to start the CA fires. Or that the CA fires are a dry run for future use of such weapons.

[bagster]

What if there is something to it? Not the trollish part, but consider that perhaps Quidam could really have been an insider but was someone who did not have enough info or enough power.

I remember Quidam.

Here's my Quidam theory.

Quidam never presented as an inside source like Q does. Some say he was Matt Drudge or some other Drudge-like person. If so, that's not an "insider" per se. That would be somebody who has INSIDER INFORMATION. In other words, a Woodward and Bernstein-like figure. One with "inside sources".

Somebody comparable today to a LS, Jerome 'Fatbody' Corsi, Sara Carter, or a John Soloman.

Of course there are people that have "inside sources". Always have been, always will be.

The huge difference between Qanon and Quidam and those others is that Q professes, and has been proven to be, THE insider. Not somebody the insider is communicating through.

And this is the mistake those who compare Q to Quidam make. It's apples and oranges.

And on the subject of Quidam. I think the only "proof" that those who call Quidam a hoax or a Larp have is that Clinton didn't get removed from office, like Quidam led us to believe he would.

We have seen four ourselves that people who are reported (by Q) to have been "turned" sometimes change their minds for various reasons. People don't always behave predictably. Quidam, or Q, can know of a deal made that gets broken. These are simply realities. It's good that we understand those things.

To dismiss Quidam out of hand as a hoax or a Larp is to not understand reality and all the possibilities that exist. It's really an "expand your thinking" thing.

Not only do I believe Q is legit, but I also believe this hard truth. That there is a possibility that Trump and his team (which includes Q and other patriots) could fail in this valiant and brave attempt to rescue America and the world.

Like I said in another post, the Derp State is vast, international, wealthy beyond understanding, and willing to do things we are not.

We can still lose. And that's what I think we did during the Clinton years. We lost. Those (perhaps) supplying Quidam with his information, lost.

And from there, our very own negative nelly FReepers were broken, never again to take a chance and maybe to lose hope forever. I've seen this attitude over and over and over again on the threads over the past year, with regards to Q. People get old. People get tired.

It has been my personal hope to reignite their fighting spirit, as mine has been. We can't give up on our true brothers and sisters, and they are many, despite their attacks on us.

We will need all our soldiers in the wars to come.

So, was Quidam a hoax? Maybe. And maybe not. Maybe he just lost.

People need to think about that.

Bagster