Ha ha. I actually think Trump has a fair dose of Dilley in him already. Not sure that more would work on a language sort of basis.
And interesting that you took a speeded up timeline out of his comments. My thinking was more in the line of being less likely to play nice and let the Dems off the hook in terms of legal jeopardy and public exposure. I got something of a message of “gloves off, but in due time”.
I just think that POTUS TRUMP sometimes cares overmuch about what the broad mass of citizen jerks think of him--his image.
I think people are wrong when they see him as mostly arrogant. I think he has more humility than most town mayors, for that matter. But there can be a streak of vanity show through that he'd be wiser to get totally on top of.
I think, paradoxically, he really DOES heart to heart identify with the poorer workers in America. Whether it's because of working so closely with them in construction or his early Christian training--something took deep root on that score. And folks who fail to discern it really miss the boat about Trump.
His letting that poor isolated black young woman continue "squatting" in Trump tower and to start sending her flowers or many thousands of other obscure kindnesses--it is from his heart--real--not show.
He even has a lot of caring for the millions of ignorant jerks who attack him and his policies. That is truly rare.
I think the timeline clue was Dilley's giddyness. He was really stoked over the intel from probably Trump Jr via Dilly's source. I don't think he'd have been THAT giddy if his impression was that the hammer thud was still quite a ways off. I certainly could be wrong and a victim of wishful thinking. It just seemed like Dilley was child-like giddy because 'Christmas was coming next week--or at least within 2 weeks, so to speak.'
Certainly, Trump is acting far less likely to play nice and let the DIMRATS off the hook in any respects.
Thanks for your kind, substantive reply.