Q Anon: 11/13/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 11/13/18 | FReepers, vanity

[HoneysuckleTN]

Electrify it to the level needed for a big longhorn bull?

I don't have a problem with that. :) But since some folks are squeamish, enough juice to prevent them from wanting to touch the fence more than once works, too.

[JockoManning]

Dr Brenda-Pile-of-Poop-Votes
Dr Brenda-Globalist-Shill-bw*tch
Dr Brenda-Domineering-Mammy-Gonna-Shove-Yo-Whitey-Face-In-Yo-Place on the bottom of the heap for a change.
etc. etc. etc.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: I think I saw posted on Twitter a list of Q predictions that never came about. I will dig it out because I know of your intellectual curiosity. ::

Q doesn’t MAKE predictions.

[JockoManning]

Thumbs up on Derek Prince. IIRC, at the time he was the youngest person ever appointed a Fellow (~”professor” for Americans) in the Philosophy Dept. in King’s College, Cambridge...as he used to remark, “I am qualified to teach Greek at the University level,” and a fascinating conversion story.

Agreed.

[MagnoliaB]

“I could care less what you discuss,”

What the hell are you talking about now!? Isn’t that why you are here in the first place?! To tell us how much you can’t stand us talking about Q. Are you on drugs?

“as long as it is confined to a small part of the board so it doesn’t crowd out others rights.”

So is that why you make your little Sturmabteilung stroll into the Q thread constantly? To make sure we stay in here and remind us you’re going to put a jackboot on our necks if we stray off this thread like some kind of Brownshirted Q thread prison guard? And all out of your concern for “others rights”.

“The site owner may prohibit any and all topics as is their absolute right. For example FR doesn’t allow 8 Chan 4 Chan stuff and restricts Q stuff to 1 thread. So be it. He he owns the board makes the rules.”

Absolutely. I’m just pointing out that your Anti-First Amendment marketing strategy may be a hell of a lot more offensive than a Q thread when it comes to donations.

“Just be glad FR hasn’t followed other social media sites and prohibited all discussion.”

I am glad. I would sure hate to not have my FR friends to discuss the latest Q happenings with.

[Okeydoker]

Not sure why anyone with a different opinion is considered a disruptor since the only things on the q thread are reprints of news headlines, cute little memes put together by people who apparently have nothing but time on their hands and talk about bad opposing viewpoints are.

There is practically nothing to disrupt assuming that was what someone wanted to do. The whole thread sounds like some type of brain dead brainwashing with person after person merely repeating the same statements of the others. This is what you q people consider intelligent conversation. Omg have you folks never escaped from your little protective bubble?

[JockoManning]

Agree about Dr Derek Prince. Would enjoy your description by PM. Thanks in advance.

[Okeydoker]

Wrong again

[MileHi]

I doubt it. Now buzz off.

[Garth Tater]

"Not sure why anyone with a different opinion is considered a disruptor"

Forget it Jake. Its Q-town.

[bagster]

So if I can’t pretend to continue supporting trump does that mean he will return my campaign donation?

Maybe I wasn't clear enough for you. You have a simple way of thinking.

You could send every penny you make to the Donald and build a shrine to him in your living room, but when you ACTIVELY work, like you do, to discourage and shut down HIS operation, you are NOT supporting him. In fact, you are harming him.

Those who simply don't know or don't "believe" in Q are not actively harming him. They aren't helping, but they aren't harming.

You, on the other hand, are.

Do you see the difference? Maybe it's too subtle for you.

Bags, you do know that your argument makes no sense.

No, it makes perfect sense. It's just a shame that I have to make it over and over and in so many different ways and you STILL don't get it. That's what boggles and makes me think you're a derp state embed. Nobody can be that willfully ignorant.

I think I saw posted on Twitter a list of Q predictions that never came about. I will dig it out because I know of your intellectual curiosity.

Don't bother. Whoever compiled that list, like you, doesn't even understand the nature of what Q is doing, so your basic understanding of "predictions" is wrong. I've had this particular argument too many times and am bored of it.

Personally I could care less what the q people spend their time doing.

Did you really fix your mouth to say that? Of course you care, or you wouldn't spend so much time at your debunkery, mockery, ridicule, and insults.

And the rest of your closing paragraph is just more of your similar jibber-jabber.

Be serious, for once.

One thing that can be said about this thread, we are conditioned to spot B.S. It's one of our most attractive qualities.

[JockoManning]

As you know, being one who HAS been presented with the reality and proofs of Q, not everybody has been presented with the Q information.

Present to them, like we are attempting to do, with "beneath the surface" information and proof of Q, and they will come to the conclusion. like I have, that Q is indeed a Presidential communication channel and psyop intended to create public support for a total rehaul of the corrupt American and world-wide (WW) political system.

It's people like you, actually, who are ACTIVELY working against this unique and first-of-it's-kind operation, that are working against the President and his good works who are the problem.

You can't have it both ways. Knowing what YOU know, you either understand that Trump and Q are connected, or you are mind-knumbingly stupit. Either that, or you are consciously working against my President and this country.

It's one or the other.

I will forgive those who haven't been shown the facts, for they know not what they do. They I will allow to "support Trump" without "believing" in Q.

And that, sir, is our mission. We call it "red-pilling". Get on board or get out of the way.

Or continue to do the work of the derp state, whichever it is. Only you know the truth of that one.

You can no longer pretend to support Trump and at the same time deny Q. You are not ignorant of Q, so that lie won't wash.

I think I've about covered every category of "Q denier" on FR with this post, yea?

And they don't have to take it personal and get sand in their vaj, either. Facts are just facts.

#TruthHurts

Absolutely. And this well over 180 IQ agrees with you thoroughly after extensive study, analysis and interpretation. The shallowness of those who pretend to know best about Q but don't know diddly is shocking.

[bagster]

So it would appear that I am in the majority and you are in the tiny minority.

Not to challenge one of your deeply imbedded beliefs, but being in the "majority" doesn't guarantee truth.

Did you know that at one time in human history, the majority of people believe the earth was flat and that if you sailed far enough, you'd fall off the edge?

Then a minority had a different idea.

Think about it.

Bagster

[MagnoliaB]

“Quidam existed on this site preceding the Clinton impeachment in the House. Quidam claimed to know what Ken Starr was up to and told all back then that Starr had the goods on Bill. Was quidam a larp? Most definitely. Deep stated? I don’t know, he just kept hammering home various things about people who would turn on the Clinton’s and they never did. It was a hoax.”

This came across as the larp and hoax attitude you have about Quidam you were projecting about Q.

[foundedonpurpose]

WTF? Why is this 900X’s to large. Have you seen the list of Q stuff that never happened??? Get a Grip!

[JockoManning]

So much for my memory. Though I don’t know that I ever knew that. LOL.

[RitaOK]

I think I’ll come back later.

This whole thread is s#^+ storm, today.

Between the weird poll taking and FEEDING the visiting, nipping foxes, our QNation has spawned more of them and we’ve killed the whole dang thread.

[little jeremiah]

Okerdoper was a troll from the first day he signed on to FR, I noticed him.

Probably a re-tread, as he jumped in with both feet (hob nailed boots actually).

[RitaOK]

A cocktail, anyone?

Later..

[bagster]

Ok, but if you’re asking about the guy, I followed him like a fool

I wouldn't call you a fool. I would call you a man looking for information, hope, and a reason to fight.

Like we do here, goodman.

We don't blindly follow. We just dare to listen, learn, and hope.

Join us.

You were not a fool then, just as we aren't now.

Bagster