We were led to believe that the democrats would be fully exposed before the mid-terms. This has not happened. Please expain where THIS question has ever been addressed before this week. I see a constantly shifting goalpost. I know the polls are a fraud but they are not trying to convince folks like me. They are simply laying the case for legitimizing potential stolen elections by saying the results were in the “margin of error”. THAT is why I want to know how it is that the democrats were allowed to skate from being shown as the liars and crooks that they are before the mid-terms. This has been a long time continuing matter of discussion on this board and none of it came to pass. Why?
We were led to believe that the democrats would be fully exposed before the mid-terms. This has not happene.
***** that would be the excuse the Democrats would use and how unfair it was, lawsuits forever and a day, I can wait.
Fully exposing the dems before the election ran the risk of introducing chaos into the process, with false flag events and Antifa flag events and who knows? It would have been worth the risk if it was the only way to win the election.
I think the Trump team determined that the mid-term election was in the bag (because of realistic polling and because election fraud has been undermined). Confident of victory in the Senate and the House, Trump decided to leave the risk chaos for later.
WE were not led to believe that the DIMRATS would be fully exposed before midterms. We never knew nor now know how many or how far up the pecking order from the bottom the arrests had even begun with.
We do know that the SEALED INDICTMENTS now number over 60,000. THAT also is MORE than NOTHING by a wide margin.
:: We were led to believe that the democrats would be fully exposed before the mid-terms. This has not happened. ::
Dude! Fail.