Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: generally

1. This is a disaster. We lost the House. The plan is lost or at least in disarray. This will be impossible to recover from. Or at least extremely difficult. Woe is me.
2. This is not good. We lost the House. Q team has a Plan B for this. We need to move to Plan B and continue to support Q/Trump and trust the Plan.
3. This is not good, but it was completely expected. Q/Trump planned for this and although they would have preferred to win the House, this is NOT a disaster. Repeat: This was expected. Not to worry.
4. This is excellent. Trump/Q lost the House on purpose. We should be happy about this.


It might seem like I was advocating for 4, but I’m more with you on #3. I was trying to push back to help see a different perspective. I’m probably more at the this was “okay” rather than “not good”. I definitely wouldn’t say “excellent”.


1,591 posted on 11/07/2018 7:48:43 AM PST by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1542 | View Replies ]


To: mongrel

it is still preferable to have *not* lost the House.

However I’m still shaking my head that the members that came up short here are/were mostly Never Trump types that themselves came up short, even people I’ve historically liked ala Barbara Comstock or Mia Love.

The historical number of resignations ahead of the election was breathtaking. The remainder lost here & now is really a desired end-state without initiation from within.

The problem + dilemma is that these are now blue seats including my own district, formerly Darrell Issa’s. From a strategic perspective it “helps” Trump to have something to run against being the obstructionist DEMs over the next couple years.

It’s like the historical dilemma of liberal REPs in the Senate - you need them to overcome fillibusters etc. but otherwise they’re a persistent pain. The joy expressed by Karl Rove and Dana Perino over the loss of the House is “spiting their face” by this purge of the last remaining Never Trump members of the Congressional delegations.

So that which remains is, as noted by “Q” last night, stronger & more pure than before - but if the question is control over no control, it’s preferable to have control (NO QUESTION)

I do share POTUS pointing to Paul RINO and others in House leadership for their circumstances. I noted last night, there was ZIP/ZILCH/NADA financial support given to my district by NRCC.

Nonetheless ... this landscape is going to change quickly & dramatically once DECLAS and other events proceed toward + following 11/11.

WWG1WGA!


1,603 posted on 11/07/2018 8:01:34 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1591 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson