Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

DISCLAIMER: Please try NOT to reply to me when commenting on this article. I have NEVER read "Q", nor am I particularly interested in the phenomenon. Your "beef" (if you have one) is not with me, but with the author of this article.

I am passing along the link in the public interest, nothing more. I have NO position in this debate, nor do I care to be involved in it.

Thank you. :>)

1 posted on 10/30/2018 10:33:15 PM PDT by Simon Foxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Simon Foxx

A lot of people were sucked in by Q. Too bad, so sad.


2 posted on 10/30/2018 10:42:04 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx
Like many cults, QAnon encourages its most dedicated followers to give money to the further the “great awakening” (of which Q is supposedly a leader)

I bounced in and out of the Q threads, so maybe I missed it, but I definitely lever saw any thing even remotely resembling a request for money.

3 posted on 10/30/2018 10:47:31 PM PDT by Chuckster (Battlestar Galactica is not fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Perhaps the biggest money-makers in the Q realm are Coleman Rogers (PamphletAnon) and his wife Christina Urso (who goes by the name CodeMonkey), who started and run Patriot’s Soapbox (PSB), a 24/7 YouTube livestream of Q analysis and registered LLC. Unirock, who has been investigating QAnon for several months, believes that PamphletAnon is responsible for turning QAnon into a cash cow.

Christina Urso in not CodeMonkey. What else about this article is bogus? Why would it be published in The Federalist? We will know more shortly after the mid-terms.


5 posted on 10/30/2018 11:07:17 PM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx
I have NO position in this debate, nor do I care to be involved in it.

And yet you involved yourself in it.

Fascinating.

7 posted on 10/30/2018 11:20:26 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Tried it didn’t like it. Thought is was a con. Bookmark for later reading.


13 posted on 10/30/2018 11:34:18 PM PDT by Karliner (Jeremiah29:11,Romans8:28 Isa 17, Damascus has fallen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

I hope you can realize that FReepers always reply to the original poster when they intend for it to be to the author of the sourced article, no reflection on you unless you take it that way.


18 posted on 10/30/2018 11:54:38 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Thanks for this further expose of the idiot salt-lick known as Q”.


23 posted on 10/31/2018 12:13:29 AM PDT by Dagnabitt ( No wall. No budget. Shut. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Trust Sessions. Yeah right...


26 posted on 10/31/2018 12:23:52 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

So this Georgi Boorman, the author of this BS article has a BS in anthropology and that’s it. In her bio, if you click on it, she claims her ‘expertise’ to write this politics based article on Q is..............

“a transplant from Seattle to small town Central Washington. She leverages a B.A. in anthropology, a background in the homeschooling community, and her experience as a mother for a unique perspective on politics and culture.”

Right O. We should read BS from an unqualified woman that doesn’t know pea turkey damn because?

By the way, didn’t all you anti-Q people get Q banned and censored off the main board here and confined to only the Q thread like a bunch of bed wetting cry baby anti-free speech liberals? So why are you breaking the rules y’all worked so hard to establish?


30 posted on 10/31/2018 1:29:38 AM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

“DISCLAIMER: Please try NOT to reply to me when commenting on this article. I have NEVER read “Q”, nor am I particularly interested in the phenomenon. Your “beef” (if you have one) is not with me, but with the author of this article.”

Why are you posting this if not to stir up sh!t.


31 posted on 10/31/2018 1:31:18 AM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Utter bullshit. Either he posts whatever he’s asked to post on 8chan, using Q’s tripcode, or he’s a vile fraud falsely claiming to be Q.

This isn’t rocket science.


32 posted on 10/31/2018 1:33:30 AM PDT by sourcery (Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Caveat: (I think nearly all Q followers would agree) Q is an interesting puzzle idea, but not taken seriously until the real legal system indicts the politician frauds.

BUT I still haven’t heard a good explanation of Q’s 30-day No-Name death prediction.


42 posted on 10/31/2018 2:28:43 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

A good number of us did take a position, one that will serve you well - until there’s some proof, assume it’s just bullshit. To buy and play into some fantasy or conspiracy because you want to believe is perhaps not a special kind of stupid but stupid nonetheless. It is the kind of stupid that is the hallmark of the liberal progressive.


45 posted on 10/31/2018 3:35:32 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

I started following the whole “Q” thing in the beginning but could devote the time to keep up properly. But frome what I’ve seen in any post here on FreeRepublic there has NEVER been a request for money.

And believe in it or not, it does get people involved with the political process. So what’s wrong with it if it dust hurt anyone?

Like with TV or the radio - if you don’t like it turn it off or change the channel.


50 posted on 10/31/2018 4:06:10 AM PDT by airborne (I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Q ???


52 posted on 10/31/2018 4:09:34 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

I read some of the Q posts and never got a thing of value that an informed person didn’t already know or couldn’t assume.

I have also felt they try to use God and people we trust to gain credibility. “ ... pray for Q and our nation” we read that and we must assume they’re good people ..... whatever.

I’ve never gotten anything of value out of a Q post. Nothing.


54 posted on 10/31/2018 4:14:31 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Simon...

And yet, your efforts to find and post about Q make it clear that you DO want to make a statement.. supposedly in magnificent ignorance. This is beyond stupid on your part if it is truly as you describe. What is the Freeper universe to make of this?

1. Q has never asked for money that I am aware of.
2. This story keeps getting posted and debunked.
3. There are many YT videos that point out Q proofs.
4. The worst case scenario for Q is that he/she has united Trump world.


60 posted on 10/31/2018 4:31:24 AM PDT by freedomjusticeruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

No personal interest, then why post this?

Curious opening.


99 posted on 10/31/2018 7:44:15 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx
"Pay no attention to the Quman beyond the curtain!"


105 posted on 10/31/2018 8:20:37 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx
.
>> “I have NO position in this debate, nor do I care to be involved in it.” <<

Said the man with the skunk spray on his trousers...

117 posted on 10/31/2018 9:16:26 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson