From Trolling To Fleecing: Co-Creator Of ‘Q’ Hoax Explains Its Scary Evolution

The Federalist ^ | 10/30/2018 | Georgi Boorman

[Simon Foxx]

A little less than a year after the first QAnon post, which has since led hundreds of thousands of news junkies down a conspiracy rabbit hole, news correspondent Jack Posobiec from One America News Network spoke with one of the co-originators of the “Q” persona who runs a group of individuals posing as a high-level government intelligence officer. On an anonymous “free speech” platform called 8Chan, they leave thousands of riddles, “clues,” odd questions, and cryptic lines as bread crumbs for their followers to help them in their search for truth.

Many major media outlets have overviewed the nest of conspiracy theories nurtured within Q followers. While many have speculated about who is behind Q and how it came to exist, thanks to Posobiec’s extensive research and the confession of a co-creator who goes by the pseudonym “Microchip,” we now know, with a high degree of certainty, the real origin story of QAnon.

[bagster]

Should we tell him about POTUS??

It'd be a waste of time. They'd just laugh and mock.

They will know soon enough.

In the meantime. Let them rest. They are tired and done. There just isn't any fight left in them, at this point. The Clintons and Obama wore them down, as did their own party, who betrayed them.

We, who still have hope and fight in us, will be the vanguard. Our brothers may join us later. We will hold no ill will toward them, for they are us, but they yet sleep.

For they are tired.

And done.

[ReaganGeneration2]

Caveat: (I think nearly all Q followers would agree) Q is an interesting puzzle idea, but not taken seriously until the real legal system indicts the politician frauds.

BUT I still haven’t heard a good explanation of Q’s 30-day No-Name death prediction.

[SaveFerris]

I currently don’t lean much one way or another. That being said...

[BUT I still haven’t heard a good explanation of Q’s 30-day No-Name death prediction.]

I have no idea what this is. What is it? TIA

[bagster]

BUT I still haven’t heard a good explanation of Q’s 30-day No-Name death prediction.

Pssst. Want my personal theory?

There are those who say that McCain was given a military tribunal and then executed on the date and time that Q predicted he would be.

I call balderdash and poppycock on that.

I think it's much simpler, but still shady.

I think McCain died some time before his death was announced. How much time? I can't say and have no way of knowing.

I think that the date and exact time of his ANNOUNCED death was arranged due to political and strategic considerations. I think that some kind of deal was made between the Trump people and the McCain people to cooperate with the charade.

Notice we got a non Derp State replacement for him AND Kavanaugh confirmed. It all worked out. McCain would have scuttled Kavanaugh or his replacement would have.

I think Trump may have promised the McCain faction of the derps to keep his name out of the mud as much as possible when the declas and other facts come.

Anyway, that's what I THINK I know. Nobody really knows for sure, except Trump, the Q team, his closest advisors who are dialed into the plan, and the McCain people closest to McCain.

Oh, and the down to the minute death "prediction" may have been pre-arranged purposefully. That would be easy enough to do, eh?

But never be under the impression that Q came out and said any of this. All theories are conjecture and guesses put together by people based on hints, questions, and clues provided by Q. He can't just come out and tell these things on the internet, now can he?

You should really check out the latest "Q proof". It is quite a good evidence that the posts signed "Q+" and not "Q" are actually messages from Trump himself, which of course also proves that Q is a legit, sanctioned Presidential operation. Of course you have to believe the evidence is legit. There's always a flaw, right? Here.

I'll post the proof for ya. After, I'm gonna go to bed, so won't have time to to over it, but it's self-explanatory, kinda, if you know how to look at the postings and pics.

Goodnight. And thanks for your respectful tone. That doesn't happen often, so I felt compelled to respond.

Q posts this on Oct 5.

5 Oct 2018 - 10:53:48 AM

twitter.com/Q_ANONBaby

Important moment in time.
The picture will be the signifier.
The signifier will 'force' the Q.
The Q will be answered (((WWG1WGA))).

(bold mine). Note the parenthesis around WWG1WGA.

The tweet is pics posted on twitter by an anon at the Trump rally in a Q shirt. He was picked out of the crowd because of his Q shirt, and taken to meet the President and had a picture with him, also posted below. The VIP (which is what Q calls Q people at rallies) says he asked Trump is Q real. He says Trump stared at him and then shrugged, and said, I dunno, maybe. Then Trump said, I do know they are good people. They. He acknowledged Q to this guy. That is, if you believe this guy.

The anon said that the Trump people would send the posed pic to the him.

And he got the pic on the 28th I think. There are pics included in the below graphic.

Now, you must first understand that many believe that the rare Q posts signed "Q+" are by Trump. Now look at the picture of the back of the photo Trump sent to, keeping in mind the three sets of parenthesis that Q posted on the 5th. Look where I wrote in red, "HELLO??? WTF???".

Three sets of parenthesis around a "+" sign, just like the parenthesis in the previous Q post and the + sign that Q+ uses as a sig at times.

The theory is that Trump was signing the photo with his Q+ signature, telling the anon, and us, and the world, that Q is real and part of his team.

Savvy?

Still. You have to believe the evidence, to believe the theory. I do, because I have hundreds of other proofs to back it up. But this is a pretty good one, if you have an open mind.

Oh. And notice the kid posing with the Prez. He has a black shirt underneath the white button up and coat. Either he used that to cover up to hide his Q shirt to get in, or the Prez' people have those for photo ops with attendees. I believe the latter. Here's the photo and stuff. If too hard to read, sorry. That's the best I can do with my limited skills.

If you care enough, there are clearer ways to look at it.

Okay, goodnight all. Hope this helps just one person see that MAYBE they were wrong to disbelieve the Q operation.

🎃

Bagster

[pt17]

A good number of us did take a position, one that will serve you well - until there’s some proof, assume it’s just bullshit. To buy and play into some fantasy or conspiracy because you want to believe is perhaps not a special kind of stupid but stupid nonetheless. It is the kind of stupid that is the hallmark of the liberal progressive.

[Irishguy]

have to agree, got no dog in this hunt but what Sourcery is saying is exactly correct.

the concept of the trip code is like a username/ password to identify users..

IF this chap is saying he is Q or part of a team, login as Q and post what is asked...if they cant...they aint...

[for-q-clinton]

So q cult is now confirmed a hoax? Something I’ve been saying from nearly the beginning.

Time to go find the threads where the Qidiots attacked me for being a non believer

[bagster]

Hi, 4Q. Long time no see, old friend.

🎃

[for-q-clinton]

You were one of the biggest asses. Attacking everyone that disagreed. Sending them personal hate mail.

Now you act like it’s ok that you were a dumb idiot. You made us all look bad from your attitude to your beliefs.

You owe everyone an apology for being an idiot.

[airborne]

I started following the whole “Q” thing in the beginning but could devote the time to keep up properly. But frome what I’ve seen in any post here on FreeRepublic there has NEVER been a request for money.

And believe in it or not, it does get people involved with the political process. So what’s wrong with it if it dust hurt anyone?

Like with TV or the radio - if you don’t like it turn it off or change the channel.

[bagster]

until there’s some proof, assume it’s just bullshit.

Did you read my post? I offer that as proof. And there are hundreds of others. For you to say there's no proof is....oh, what's the word. Starts with an S. What you said.

And do you really think we believe in this so-called "conspiracy theory" just because we want to, and based on nothing? I do have to agree with you, that really WOULD be stupid. But it's just not the case.

So I have to call shenanigans on that one too, goodman. Nothing personal, but there are flaws in your argument.

Happy Halloween.

[dennisw]

Q ???

[bagster]

4Q. You have it exactly backwards, of course, and you know it's true. You were the rude, insulting, hate-mailing (ahaha SJW term) guy.

You just didn't like it when I PERSONALLY tore you a new one EVERY time you disrupted the threads with your tom-foolery.

So don't come around pretending and playing the innocent. That game is tired.

Anyway. What do you make of my Q proof post I made above. Did you have a look? Whaddya think? Or is it the same shtick. Attack first, read never.

p.s. I owe nobody an apology. Again, quite the opposite. But I'm not a baby, and I don't whine.

You?

[boycott]

I read some of the Q posts and never got a thing of value that an informed person didn’t already know or couldn’t assume.

I have also felt they try to use God and people we trust to gain credibility. “ ... pray for Q and our nation” we read that and we must assume they’re good people ..... whatever.

I’ve never gotten anything of value out of a Q post. Nothing.

[bagster]

You were one of the biggest asses.

you were a dumb idiot.

for being an idiot.

And that's you on your best behavior in just one post. Imagine weeks and months of much worse.

But we're the bad guys?

Tsk, tsk, 4Q.

Everybody sees.

[bagster]

we must assume they’re good people ..... whatever.

So, you're saying we're BAD people?

What are you saying?

[Fightin Whitey]

Booooooring.

Why don't you whip up an Hornacle...

...or something to liven matters up?

[bagster]

I’ve never gotten anything of value out of a Q post. Nothing.

I've got tons.

Maybe our level of effort differed?

[bagster]

Hahaha. How non-sequiterish, whitey.

Stick this in yer pocket.

[freedomjusticeruleoflaw]

Simon...

And yet, your efforts to find and post about Q make it clear that you DO want to make a statement.. supposedly in magnificent ignorance. This is beyond stupid on your part if it is truly as you describe. What is the Freeper universe to make of this?

1. Q has never asked for money that I am aware of.
2. This story keeps getting posted and debunked.
3. There are many YT videos that point out Q proofs.
4. The worst case scenario for Q is that he/she has united Trump world.