Skip to comments.
From Trolling To Fleecing: Co-Creator Of ‘Q’ Hoax Explains Its Scary Evolution
The Federalist ^
| 10/30/2018
| Georgi Boorman
Posted on 10/30/2018 10:33:15 PM PDT by Simon Foxx
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-214 next last
This is the Q message. Stand united, Patriots. Don't let them divide us. Vote for Freedom!
21
posted on
10/31/2018 12:05:54 AM PDT
by
KitJ
(Shall not be infringed...)
I've got your Blue Wave right here. Vote Patriots.
22
posted on
10/31/2018 12:09:10 AM PDT
by
KitJ
(Shall not be infringed...)
To: Simon Foxx
Thanks for this further expose of the idiot salt-lick known as Q”.
23
posted on
10/31/2018 12:13:29 AM PDT
by
Dagnabitt
( No wall. No budget. Shut. It. Down.)
To: Dagnabitt
24
posted on
10/31/2018 12:19:36 AM PDT
by
KitJ
(Shall not be infringed...)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
The short version of every cult’s message, including that of the Q fantasy-sharing cult:
“Big Event soon! Special knowledge available here.”
25
posted on
10/31/2018 12:22:00 AM PDT
by
Dagnabitt
( No wall. No budget. Shut. It. Down.)
To: Simon Foxx
Trust Sessions. Yeah right...
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
just a little fyi, I haven't read the original at the link, because frankly I couldn't give a crap about QAnon.
27
posted on
10/31/2018 12:50:27 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
To: Simon Foxx; bagster
I will try not to post my response to you, but I am just now, this very moment, “identifying “ as a left wing liberal snowflake who doesn’t know how to try to understand what anyone else who does not agree with them thinks, so my efforts to not post to you are futile.
Why post this article when you admit to not reading Q?
Are you just trying to get Q people to defend and explain the posts to you? I believe you could read Bagster’s Oracles to get a handle on things. You are willfully choosing to remain ignorant but truth will win, POTUS will win, bad people will be dealt with, and we will have our country back.
Remain blue pilled. The choice is yours.
You are along for the ride anyway, whether you know it or not.
WWG1WGA!
28
posted on
10/31/2018 12:52:01 AM PDT
by
TheTexasMom
(Q is my homie)
To: SubMareener
"We will know more shortly after the mid-terms."
Q has 54,000 sealed indictments against it?
29
posted on
10/31/2018 1:09:20 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Simon Foxx
So this Georgi Boorman, the author of this BS article has a BS in anthropology and that’s it. In her bio, if you click on it, she claims her ‘expertise’ to write this politics based article on Q is..............
“a transplant from Seattle to small town Central Washington. She leverages a B.A. in anthropology, a background in the homeschooling community, and her experience as a mother for a unique perspective on politics and culture.”
Right O. We should read BS from an unqualified woman that doesn’t know pea turkey damn because?
By the way, didn’t all you anti-Q people get Q banned and censored off the main board here and confined to only the Q thread like a bunch of bed wetting cry baby anti-free speech liberals? So why are you breaking the rules y’all worked so hard to establish?
30
posted on
10/31/2018 1:29:38 AM PDT
by
MagnoliaB
(You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
To: Simon Foxx
“DISCLAIMER: Please try NOT to reply to me when commenting on this article. I have NEVER read “Q”, nor am I particularly interested in the phenomenon. Your “beef” (if you have one) is not with me, but with the author of this article.”
Why are you posting this if not to stir up sh!t.
31
posted on
10/31/2018 1:31:18 AM PDT
by
MagnoliaB
(You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
To: Simon Foxx
Utter bullshit. Either he posts whatever he’s asked to post on 8chan, using Q’s tripcode, or he’s a vile fraud falsely claiming to be Q.
This isn’t rocket science.
32
posted on
10/31/2018 1:33:30 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: higgmeister
Posting an article and then telling people not to respond to it.......what a bunch of stupidness.
33
posted on
10/31/2018 1:34:17 AM PDT
by
MagnoliaB
(You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
To: TheTexasMom
Looks like more pot stirring to see if they can get Q banned and censored off this board completely.
34
posted on
10/31/2018 1:36:22 AM PDT
by
MagnoliaB
(You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
To: All
35
posted on
10/31/2018 1:54:22 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Lopeover
Haha. I know. Same article two days ago. Same commentary. Same arguments. Same not listening.
Booooooring.
36
posted on
10/31/2018 1:56:06 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
37
posted on
10/31/2018 2:02:15 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
38
posted on
10/31/2018 2:04:28 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: All
39
posted on
10/31/2018 2:08:35 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: All
40
posted on
10/31/2018 2:16:48 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-214 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson