1 posted on
10/29/2018 10:18:28 AM PDT by
ETL
To: ETL
It could - but what explains misbehaving neutrons?......
To: ETL
To: ETL
4 posted on
10/29/2018 10:25:02 AM PDT by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: ETL
To: ETL
“Somehow, when the universe was about a tenth of a trillionth of a second old, the laws of nature skewed ever-so-slightly in the direction of matter.”
The only real way to do “speculative science” like this is to project the current conditions into the past and extrapolate what the universe must have been like then. Once you make the desperate leap to assuming that the most basic conditions like the physical laws must have been different in the past, you have compromised your own extrapolation. There is absolutely no way to determine anything about the past beyond the point where you postulate the physical laws were different, since you have no way to determine what those physical laws might have been like, or what the ramifications of those changes would have been.
6 posted on
10/29/2018 10:28:00 AM PDT by
Boogieman
To: ETL
Since the universe is binary, you can have good neutrinos and bad neutrinos.
Imho.
5.56mm
9 posted on
10/29/2018 10:33:42 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
(DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
To: ETL
10 posted on
10/29/2018 10:35:32 AM PDT by
blam
To: ETL
15 posted on
10/29/2018 10:55:11 AM PDT by
GraceG
("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
To: ETL
This is really a well written article. Thanks for posting.
To: ETL
Naughty Neutrons.
17 posted on
10/29/2018 10:58:02 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: ETL
How wonderful we have met with a paradox.
Now we have some hope of making progress.
—Neils Bohr
19 posted on
10/29/2018 11:04:37 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: ETL
Sounds like a job for
21 posted on
10/29/2018 11:21:56 AM PDT by
DannyTN
To: ETL
Stupid question.
Keep trying. It’s not alternate universes. It’s not the “multiverse.” It’s not matter popping in and out of existence. It’s not a simulation in some colossal video game. It’s not “something from nothing.” What do you think it could be?
22 posted on
10/29/2018 11:41:19 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(The country is suffering from a hysterical obsession with race, skin color and national origin.)
To: ETL
Whenever a headline asks a question,
the answer is usually, “No.”
23 posted on
10/29/2018 12:11:51 PM PDT by
sparklite2
(See more at Sparklite Times)
To: ETL
or, maybe Genesis 1:1 does . . .
25 posted on
10/29/2018 12:25:59 PM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: ETL
They are bothersome, but not on a universe disrupting level.
26 posted on
10/29/2018 12:30:06 PM PDT by
csvset
(illegitimi non carborundum)
To: ETL
Real Science deals with How, not Why.
31 posted on
10/29/2018 4:01:30 PM PDT by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
