Anyone have any thoughts on Q 2374? Do they have the data or are they trying to get the data?
My read says the data was compromised.
It looks like they gave access to “outside developers”.
How much do you want to bet it was on purpose?
How much do you want to bet that those “outside developers” were carefully chosen? Or paid for the access?
How much do you want to bet that those “outside developers” had political motivations or plans to exploit the data?
How much do you want to bet that those “outside developers” did not destroy all copies of data they had access to?
.
.
.
... and most of all, how much do you want to bet that it doesn’t matter so much that “outside developers” had access to the data because Google itself would abuse the data in the same manner? In fact, I would be highly suspicious that the “outside developers” story is either to cover for what Google itself is doing or to put some distance between Google and the exploiters of the data.
JMO, JMSpeculation.
Google faked a "data breach" in order to clean out their "draft comms" that Q told us about a while back.
That's how I read it.
Also, no doubt the NSA/Q/Trump "has it all" anyway", and that's one thing. But it's a whole nother thing to get caught with the murder weapon in your possession, if you take my meaning.
I no longer believe "cover stories" the derps put out. We are way beyond that now.
Red pills have that side-effect.
Bagster