Already concluded that -- on 500+ pages of report, have you? Nice example of "shooting from the hip -- with the piece half-cocked"...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You obviously don't understand the function of an Inspector General.
It is the IG's job to identify things within the organization investigated which either need fixing, prosecuting, or both.
It is then up to prosecutors to do the job of getting indictments (as if some of the 50K sealed ones don't already cover items exposed here).
Aren't you aware that Huber -- the prosecutor -- has been using the same >400-person team of investigators that the IG used? Did you think those indictments appeared out of thin air?
We're all disappointed that we don't have lists of damning e-mails, etc. But, you'll never see an IG's report that exposes real, prosecutable evidence. Such exposure could even be construed as obstructing justice. Evidence is simply not the IG's job... Besides, cases can't go forward until many of the faults (perfidy) reported by the IG are, at least neutralized -- and clean replacements put in place.
Read the report. The US didn't have a Federal Bureau of Investigation. it had a Foul Bunch of CYA artists! The IG has now handed Sessions the ammunition to flush through this "Critical Path" list:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you don't have the patience to allow the Gannt chart to run its course, get in the back seat with the other infants who continually whine:
TXnMA
My “jumping the gun” was based on the recommendations within the executive summary. No real structural changes, nor demotions, nor firings, were recommended. Hence, any Swamp draining will indeed have to come from elsewhere.
Slipped my mind. FReepmail.