I tend to agree, but that does nothing to take away from the "Scalia [187]" theory.
And Q pretty much confirms it. Pedophelia notwithstanding.
Bagster
I tend to agree, but that does nothing to take away from the "Scalia [187]" theory.
And Q pretty much confirms it. Pedophelia notwithstanding.
Bagster
I tend to accept the Scalia[187] theory.
Scalia[187] started to get traction because of other mysterious events such as no autopsy, cremated immediately thereafter.
That traction was followed by Scalia pedophile stories.
My point was Scalia[187] caused Scalia pedophilia to crop up as cover.
At the time Scalia[187] was gaining traction, pedophilia was first-page buzz. It seemed plausible to me that those who control narrative would inject ‘Scalia was a pedophile’ fiction to cause a slip up to the hounds on the trail of Scalia[187].
I know such devious minds exist to pull off such schemes. Not only are they sick minds, they take glee in doing such things. One of the narrative control outfits is a Podesta PR firm in Manhattan. Their writers write at whiteboards throughout the day with counternarratives to control the message. I see their end days are approaching with the great awakening via social media but not without a fight, their Tech Lords are bringing their censorship and control algorithms to the fight.