I'm on board.
But, anything's possible in this mixed up, mumbled up, shook up world (just ask Lola).
Bagster
I tend to accept the Scalia[187] theory.
Scalia[187] started to get traction because of other mysterious events such as no autopsy, cremated immediately thereafter.
That traction was followed by Scalia pedophile stories.
My point was Scalia[187] caused Scalia pedophilia to crop up as cover.
At the time Scalia[187] was gaining traction, pedophilia was first-page buzz. It seemed plausible to me that those who control narrative would inject ‘Scalia was a pedophile’ fiction to cause a slip up to the hounds on the trail of Scalia[187].
I know such devious minds exist to pull off such schemes. Not only are they sick minds, they take glee in doing such things. One of the narrative control outfits is a Podesta PR firm in Manhattan. Their writers write at whiteboards throughout the day with counternarratives to control the message. I see their end days are approaching with the great awakening via social media but not without a fight, their Tech Lords are bringing their censorship and control algorithms to the fight.
I'm on board.
But, anything's possible in this mixed up, mumbled up, shook up world (just ask Lola).
Bagster