Skip to comments.
vanity - A New Supreme Court Justice Suggestion for President Trump
19 Sept 18
| hapnHAL
Posted on 09/19/2018 8:08:01 PM PDT by hapnHal
Should President Trump nominate Hillary Clinton to the Supreme Court so he could finally get an investigation started on her?
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: stupidvanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
09/19/2018 8:08:01 PM PDT
by
hapnHal
To: hapnHal
That’s stupid. Background checks are not criminal investigations
2
posted on
09/19/2018 8:09:50 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Nifster
1 solid week of “I don’t recall” from the most qualified person to ever run for the presidency...
3
posted on
09/19/2018 8:11:58 PM PDT
by
shotgun
To: Nifster
They’d give her an all clear. Yup, our DOH-j.
4
posted on
09/19/2018 8:22:52 PM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
The Republicans on the committee would fall all over themselves showing their bipartisanship and she would be the fastest approval in history.
5
posted on
09/19/2018 8:35:23 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(nnw)
To: Nifster
From what I’ve seen so far,many of them are more than just simple background checks. They seem to be rather severe forms of intimidation. They seem to be seeking much more than there is to be found.
6
posted on
09/19/2018 8:38:46 PM PDT
by
oldtech
To: hapnHal
Make her an honorary astronaut and send her to the moon.
To: hapnHal
Great idea.....just to see her loose again.
8
posted on
09/19/2018 8:57:01 PM PDT
by
Bommer
(Help out 2ndDivisionVet and his wife - https://www.gofundme.com/married-recent-amputees)
To: Nifster
That’s stupid. Background checks are not criminal investigationsWhat do you call what they're doing to Kavanaugh then?
9
posted on
09/19/2018 9:02:34 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: hapnHal
LOL.
If Jay Leno were still on the air, that’s the kind of joke he would include in his opening monologue.
10
posted on
09/19/2018 9:29:42 PM PDT
by
unlearner
(A war is coming.)
To: hapnHal
Dangerous, all the Democrats would still vote for her and all the RINOs too. Fortunately, McLame is not around any more.
To: Nifster
Still, it’s quite funny. LOL funny.
To: hapnHal
It would mean that she’d actually have to work forty-odd hours a week...something she hasn’t done since the late 1980s.
To: Bommer
Don't let her loose. let her stay tight.She might not lose this time.
14
posted on
09/19/2018 10:04:15 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(nnv)
To: Bommer
Don't let her loose. let her stay tight.She might not lose this time.
15
posted on
09/19/2018 10:04:16 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(nnv)
To: pepsionice
With sufficient breaks for a bit of wine d she could get through the day.
16
posted on
09/19/2018 10:05:55 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(nuv)
To: pepsionice
With sufficient breaks for a bit of wine she could get through the day.
17
posted on
09/19/2018 10:06:10 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(nuv)
To: hapnHal
Candace Owens should replace RBG.
18
posted on
09/19/2018 11:25:36 PM PDT
by
proudpapa
(This is not the tagline you are looking for.)
To: oldtech
You’re thinking of the special counsel or the soft coup attempt. Strzok won’t be doing anything on Ford case
19
posted on
09/19/2018 11:45:12 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: TigersEye
He’s had six background checks nothing like this has come up not even a suggestion of a drinking history
I call this the typical democratic playbook. Has nothing to do with a background check
20
posted on
09/19/2018 11:47:44 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson