Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mac_truck
Not what happened, San Fran. (Trolly, get it?)

The *time stamp* on the supposed message (which wouldn't have been typed in by hand by Microchip)...was two days earlier than a hypertext link with the date built in.

Neither one generated by the poster.

And therefore, the post must be fake.

Only *possible* exception is that the dead tree version of weekly newsmagazines sometimes shows up at news stands a day or two early (post-date printed on cover).

If the magazine folks do the same crap with e-columns, it just might be he had a heads up from the publisher and grabbed the link without looking.

But I doubt it. Look up the post yourself, and find the link to the article.

Click through, and then go to the home page and then the "Contact us". Ask them if they ever pre-date articles before web publication?

1,199 posted on 09/16/2018 4:22:14 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1192 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
The *time stamp* on the supposed message (which wouldn't have been typed in by hand by Microchip)...was two days earlier than a hypertext link with the date built in. Neither one generated by the poster. And therefore, the post must be fake.

The time stamp is generated by the Discord software and therefore could have had a glitch where it spit the wrong date.

Are you saying that is not possible, and that any time a date glitch occurs it proves a hoax?

1,206 posted on 09/16/2018 4:30:03 PM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson