In defense of txhurl, I had trouble interpreting the Q drop as to which side OANN was on. I thought they were at least tainted, but since I don’t have OANN, I didn’t worry about it too much.
AAG44, I hope you’re right. From what I hear, they have a reputation as a conservative alternative to the MSM. There are so few of them and we keep finding out that many have turned out to be “controlled opposition.”
Maybe we need a list of players to keep things sorted out. The DS leftwing MSM, the conservative alternatives, and the “controlled opposition” that appears conservative but is really DS controlled.
At first read of the drop I also thought Q was saying OANN was not to be trusted. After rereading I saw it exactly opposite. I too hope they are the few remaining good guys in this never ending battle.
It occurred to me after reading through the last lexicon post that some names get confusing, the example being the men named Spencer.
I running side by side list of good/bad would be a great tool.
If I had any mad skills on the computer, I’d do it. But it’s not something I’m good at. All my random notes end up a big mess so that’s not helpful either.
The one list I’ve kept separate is the never Trumpers and the Sessions haters. Those are names I won’t soon forget.
I believe that Posobiec is a LIAR + FRAUD; OANN is good (but has Posobiec) and the new ‘reportforthepresident.org’ side good in theory but also tied to Posobiec (who then lied about his association with the originating site / group)