Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black
How about engaging with the evidence, for a change, instead of more ad hominem attacks and name-calling?

Here's why, Jack. Because we are here to research and discuss the Qanon messages, not debate whether Q is real or not.

In most of our minds (mine for sure) Q is authentic. So here we sit, monitoring and researching his messages, learning about the derp state and watching events progress, knowing before the non-Q followers what is at least planned by the President and his team.

We are tasked with learning and spreading the truth. We don't have time to engage with the Microfaggots and Jack Blacks of the world over whether Q is a legitimate source of information. That's settled science.

You don't know what a "shill" is? Like you didn't know what 8chan was the other day?

Your feigned ignorance is obnoxious, goodman. Stop it.

You are not a victim. Every thing that gets said to you is well-deserved. You don't believe in Q. You never believed in Q. Everything you post is seeded with a negative spin intended to undermine our mission here. You know it. I know it. Everybody knows it.

Also, do you realize how insulting it is for you to accuse us of being a "religion" or a "cult"? I think you do, and that's why you, and the other trolls do it.

Many people here are actually religious. For you to put Q in the same category as their religion belittles their religion. It's your (and the other trolls) way of calling us ignorant sheep following a cult of personality because we can't think for ourselves.

It sets you up as the wise, independent thinker who is here to guide us away from our foolish path.

Stop with the "religious/cult" mockery, goodman. It's not a good look for somebody that claims to be here "seeking the truth".

Anyway. That's my Jack Black comeback of the day.

Jack Black - #TeamMicroChip

Bagster


598 posted on 09/06/2018 7:23:43 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

:: whether Q is a legitimate source of information. That’s settled science. ::

Science? I deny it!


772 posted on 09/07/2018 4:58:17 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson