I think it was you who pointed out that “Q” has only said that if RR dirty then the Mule is dirty and vice versa. It is a natural + inevitable + logically sound conclusion to reach the opposite i.e. if one is good then the other too - but that’s not been said, but it’s still inevitable IMO though the latter allows for other variations + possibilities.
Nonetheless, things being what they are, in my mind it’s inevitable it’s one or the other - they’re either good (or leveraged) or they’re bad.
Two thoughts - MIRROR:
1) if part of the plan that’s now recognized (at least on these threads lol) that Trump trashing on Sessions is theater and setup for normies to accept the final reveal - then isn’t a correlation of that the same is true of getting right minded folks, fellow FReepers, etc., to go against RR & the Mule similarly? POTUS never goes all out against them nor does “Q” either - pointing out the 13 then 17 ‘angry dems’, yes. When Trump was asked what he thought of RR, I think it was the day he DECLAS’d the Nunes memo - he said something like, “what do you think?” and another time, I think, “you’ll find out”.
2) I now increasingly + highly think we may find Trump signed the 4th FISA being the one that RR also signed that he testified is not what it’s made out to be in the press and public discourse about these things. Given what the D-J / FISC revealed in the FOIA response to JW this past week - there were no hearings - neither for when Hussein was in office for October + January and then after. The rules for FISA provide two paths - either through the Court with hearing (and rubber stamp) or through EO by POTUS. It’s now widely speculated the latter was the case for 10/16 + 1/17 - and that LL + Hussein are redacted signatories. But after Trump is in office ... the FISA’s remain the same form albeit renewal applications and different judges.
I’ve suspected that in the RR + the Mule = WH being the special prosecutor that Trump pledged in debate to hire to investigate HRC matters - and, whether WH or BH, that is regardless +/- otherwise a honeypot for rabid Clintonistas who were then placed back under (legal + even personally authorized) government monitoring - then everything else we’ve learned is well explained - and it’s glorious!
It could well be that the 5/2017 FISA - apparently made curiously + well before the prior warrant’s expiration date - has good stuff ... or it’s a rehash of FNYT regurgitating the James Wolfe leak - in either case, RR is exposed and something will have to happen.
This morning I’m once again extremely hopeful & in positive disbelief - can you imagine the gnashing of teeth - if the tables were fully turned and Trump - like Hussein before - approved & signed the FISA - based on legit evidence vs. bogus dossier & Isikoff’s machinations.
Regardless it’s going to be an amazing + surprising reveal.
#FLY[RR]FLY#
BTW - saw an interesting anon note on GA thread posted last night; somebody tied the Mule to “when does a bird sing?” - his wife’s name is Anne and there is a character “Anne Mueller” in “The Thornbirds”
TBD ;)
I agree with most of your points ... except ... I will be extremely surprised if either Zero or Trump signed any FISA apps. I see no upside for either of them signing personally.
You are quite right to point out that POTUS has never directly attacked RR or Mueller, at least publicly.
And referring to Mueller as the “17” has GOT to mean something...right?
Cf: “ I was probably in Washington in my entire life 17 times. “