Posted on 09/01/2018 9:49:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
Drudge is running a lede for a NYT article right now - saw it and thought of you:
“Jerome Corsi, Conspiracy Theorist, Is Subpoenaed in Mueller Investigation
By Maggie Haberman
Sept. 5, 2018”
New York Times:Jerome Corsi, Conspiracy Theorist, Is Subpoenaed in Mueller Investigation
Yes, thank you. Would like some peach ice cream right after we finish our water aerobics in the Qanteen pool.
(Aquamarine and TEXOKIE in sync making a Q in the water) :)
How do you know?
The only investigator that I regularly check in with is George Webb on UTUBE. He has a most interesting segment today that I just listened to. It concerns Q.
“Day 70.1 Following Q To Club-K In Norfolk, VA”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJBpQCFDfOk
“Is Flynn Q ? Did He Blow the Whistle on Club K ?”
He doesn’t draw any conclusions, just raises the possibility today. Undoubtedly, further investigation will follow.
GOP lawmakers will ask President Trump on Thursday to issue a declassification order on all Carter Page FISA docs, Bruce Ohr 302s and other relevant Russia docs.
Representatives Lee Zeldin (R-NY), Mark Meadows (R-NC), Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Matt Gaetz (R-FL) will ask President Trump to throw down his ace card tomorrow and declassify all the pertinent Russia docs.
Reflection in the AF1_5A_3 window shows a breast.
Think mirror.
There was some speculation around the original drops that photos were being taken/captured via Melania’s phone.
* POTUS reaches into the desk and pulls out a bound sheet of paper and DATES it. An EO. He tells them, “Just Did it.”
* They gasp and he follows on, “All you had to do was just ask me.
Is [AS] confirming that Scalia was indeed assassinated?
FREAKING EYE OPENING!!!!!!!!!
Hows a cereal lurker go about getting suspended????
Why telegraph your move ahead of time?
I think #2087 is the first time I've seen that AS was "removed" because they saw him as a threat to prosecution of Hillary. I wondered why he was [187] but hadn't realized Hillary felt threatened by him.
And here's my problem with that debunking.
"So whats the problem? First, those search results showing up on PACER arent just indictments, theyre court proceedings. That certainly includes indictments, but it also includes search warrants, records of petty offenses (like speeding tickets), wiretap and pen register applications, etc.
A FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT does not handle such minor things as "speeding tickets." In fact, FEDERAL COURTS don't handle many "petty offenses" at all, especially not with SEALED INDICTMENTS. . . which shows the lack of knowledge the author of this "debunking" has about what he is talking about.
There’s an even more similar book called Q Clearance by Peter Benchley. It’s still available, but only in print maybe secondhand. Surprised that wasn’t included in the debunk attempt.
Go to a different thread, use the worst language you can think to use, in all CAPS go on about 9/11, aliens and UFOs. Use plenty of milk for the cereal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.