Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black
Hiya, Jacky boy.

I see you updated your profile page. It's very interesting. Everybody should check it out.

:)

Bagster


532 posted on 08/26/2018 11:30:08 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

That was adapted by a post on the last thread, but not the one you commented on.


592 posted on 08/27/2018 7:25:32 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black; bagster
I see you updated your profile page. It's very interesting. Everybody should check it out.

I did and found the usual obfuscation.

Let's look at Jack's score keeping. Of course he doesn't count, he says, anything on Team Trump from before Team Mueller joined the field, but is that really fair? No, it isn't.

First of all, Jack loads the dice by scoring things only Team Mueller can do by giving VERY HIGH cores for indictments and convictions and VERY LOW scores for things that Team Trumo can do such as forced resignations, firings, and no scoring at all for demotions, failing to recognize that most of the Deep State actors are protected by Civil Service and Union rules; taking action against them is extremely difficult. Mueller has no restrictions on whom or what he can indict.

Secondly, Jack does not discriminate in his listing of indictments on whether they are Mueller's teams or indictments from ancillary investigations not at all connected in any way with Mueller's initial charge to investigate Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential Election. Instead, Jack attributes to Mueller such indictments as an income tax charge against a man who had no involvement at all in the election, a forgery charge against a California man who also had NO involvement in the election, but jack grants high scoring points to these bit players to the Mueller Team. These indictments could have and SHOULD have been brought by any run-of-the-mill US Attorney, and in fact were under investigation prior to Mueller's involvement.

Other guilty pleas most likely would not have resulted in indictments, according to the investigators involved, who stated they saw no deception in their reports, yet Mueller brought charges DESPITE the investigators disagreement, wearing down the resources of the accused until they were bankrupt and could no longer afford to defend themselves. This is not a tactic that Team Trump is permitted to use.

Let's revue Team Mueller's "triumphs" and see if they pass muster:

Now let's look at Team Trump:

Jack states on his FR home page:

Start date for Index is the date of Mueller appointment, May 17, 2017. Firings prior to that, or firings for matters unrelated the the Deep State Coup investigation and counter-investigation, are not included in the Index but are available on this link, and also included as a link from post #1 on all Qanon threads.

Jack unreasonably attributes only these few to Team Trump:

But Jack gets to determine who he includes according to his biases. . . and he misses a lot, because he is not paying attention, and because of his arbitrary, self-determined starting date .

Let's see whom else should be included in the Team Trump list whom Jack chooses to exclude:

I think Jack needs to revise his point schedule for the actions available to Team Trump.

How many points should we count for removing an undeserved VERY HIGH level security clearance from John Brennan?

If we are honest and discount the FOURTEEN points that Jack assigns to Team Mueller for indictments and convictions which are totally unrelated to the Russia Probe Mandate and then count the ACTUAL DEEP STATE PEOPLE who have been discharged, demoted, forced to resign, forced to take early retirement, etc, by Team Trump, including a ½ point for each demotion, then we should get a clearer picture of the status of activity between each team in cleaning up their respective problems.

I get:


1,066 posted on 08/27/2018 8:02:39 PM PDT by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson