Posted on 08/21/2018 9:46:21 PM PDT by ransomnote
It was a joke.
Yes, I’ve been reading it all morning. Have learned a LOT about Skull & Bones in Arkansas, and I’m not done yet. A lecturer at Arkansas named William was faculty-tapped into S&B.
And, does the current status of “national emergency” provide for ‘martial law’ on an ad hoc declaration basis?
IOW, since we are in an national emergency, can GEOTUS declare martial law with the stroke of a pen?
My speculation is . . . given POTUS' 156 IQ; given high IQ military intel and high ranking Officers vigorously supporting POTUS--evidently including military Judge Advocates; . . . there MUST be SOME logical reasoning postulating a RELATIVELY Constitutional justification for military tribunals IN THE CURRENT NATIONAL EMERGENCY SURVIVAL CONTEXT.
imho, it is relatively unlikely that such a justification would be very tenuous, weak, prone to being overturned etc. I don't think POTUS et al are that stupid.
I'm not real clear about the legal distinctions between war/National Emergency; about vulnerable civilians in 'war time;' etc. A lot of that seems like hair-splitting and therefore legally weak, prone to being very challenged, if not overturned.
Could it be the intensity of the treason? Conceivable but I don't know that THAT would make something legally more solid.
Could it be that the expected ground-swell of a huge proportion of the populace DEMANDING something like a military tribunal? Conceivable but I doubt that would make something legally more solid.
So, I'm left with the conviction that there must be something fairly unknown or a slant not considered that would make military tribunals something of a slam-dunk for military tribunals to be successfully operant in this National Emergency context.
Is it conceivable that the outrage could be so extreme and long enduring that they could push through a tweak of the Constitution through sufficient numbers of States such that in a National Emergency of extreme factors, a military tribunal would be explicitly stated as not only allowed but fitting and called on? Conceivable but I doubt such a protracted, convoluted process would be leaned on for military tribunals. That's just not so logical, to me.
It is a bit mystifying. That does not mean that when it all comes down to the wire, it will still be mystifying.
Do you have more on MK-Ultra?
Nice try on linking the Ohrs to serial killer forensic drawings ... but I’m not buyin’ it.
Is that real?
How critical, legally, is the DEGREE of survival being seriously at risk?
Given various actions by various Presidents over the decades . . . e.g. Lincoln, FDR et al . . . doing administrative actions not strictly Constitutional and getting away with it i.e. their actions stuck and they did not get in any legal trouble--what is the potential for THAT kind of action vis a vis military tribunals?
I'm doubtful POTUS would take THAT route but it is conceivable.
I’m not buying it either - more than a stretch lol - but not much different than the speculation about Podestas & McCann ;)
However, I still have a moderate hunch or speculation that there's some 'neither' possibility that no one has publicly articulated, yet.
How would you summarize the main points. Won’t likely get to the link for a while yet.
For the perusal of the group - the CIA promoted the modern art movement:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html
“The decision to include culture and art in the US Cold War arsenal was taken as soon as the CIA was founded in 1947. Dismayed at the appeal communism still had for many intellectuals and artists in the West, the new agency set up a division, the Propaganda Assets Inventory, which at its peak could influence more than 800 newspapers, magazines and public information organisations. They joked that it was like a Wurlitzer jukebox: when the CIA pushed a button it could hear whatever tune it wanted playing across the world.”
I’m assuming so...
Statement from U.S. Attorney Bobby L. Christine Regarding Sentencing for Reality Winner
AUGUSTA, GA: The sentence rendered today is the longest received by a defendant for an unauthorized disclosure of national defense information to the media. It appropriately satisfies the need for both punishment and deterrence in light of the nature and seriousness of the offense.
When Reality Winner committed her crime, she was employed as a contractor at a National Security Agency facility in the Southern District of Georgia. She held a TOP SECRET/SCI security clearance, had access to classified information, had signed multiple nondisclosure agreements, and plainly abused her position of trust.
Sanctimonious front holes.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I am not aware of Q ever saying civilians would end up in military tribunals.
Are you sure that wasn't a Q wanna-be?
Personally, I do not see it happening ... but I will rethink that position if someone can show me a clear message from Q that it is part of the plan.
Even then, I might suspect it was Q trolling the RATS, because military tribunals for civilian Americans (not directly tied to terrorism) would be a drastic and irrevocable step away from the Constitution and the principle that elected representatives of the People control the military.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think this is ridiculous.
The author is ignorant of the art world and even refers to "Abstract Expressionism" as an avant-garde movement. the two styles have very little in common.
What is true is that certain modern and contemporary styles reflect the nihilism and deconstructionism of the execrable neo-Marxist philosophy of post-modernism.
Enemies foreign and domestic.
because military tribunals for civilian Americans
Yeh, guess I’m still trusting the plan......
I think that whatever the Q team has planned will be legit, and probably something put into place by the cabal (Bush/Clinton/Obummer). Thus they will be hoisted by their own petards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.