^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I am not aware of Q ever saying civilians would end up in military tribunals.
Are you sure that wasn't a Q wanna-be?
Personally, I do not see it happening ... but I will rethink that position if someone can show me a clear message from Q that it is part of the plan.
Even then, I might suspect it was Q trolling the RATS, because military tribunals for civilian Americans (not directly tied to terrorism) would be a drastic and irrevocable step away from the Constitution and the principle that elected representatives of the People control the military.
because military tribunals for civilian Americans
Yeh, guess I’m still trusting the plan......
Seems to me, there's more than a LOT of justification for considering a long list of liberal hidiots on the other side to be co-combatants foundationally out to overthrow the lawful government of the US OF A--even by force.
No. Q rarely comes right out and says anything, if I'm not mistaken. But a lot of times we ask ourselves just this simple question. Why did he post this? Often-times a lot of the message can be found in thinking about just that.
Anyway. Read Q post #1926 and ask yourself. Why did he post this?
What else could it mean? Really only one of two things. Well, three. Either they plan on using military tribunals, it's disinformation (a lie), or Q is fake.
I think they plan on using military tribunals.
Bagster