Makes sense but the point of my post was that one takes on ^voluntarily^ government suppression of first amendment rights through a security clearance.
Arguing that a security clearance is equal to free speech is stupidity on the highest level.
Just found in Bloodlines, (Springmeier, 1995)
The following families (besides others) or individuals from these families are mentioned in Dope Inc. as involved in some aspect of the drug trade: the Astors, Bundys, DuPonts, Freemans, Kennedys, Lis, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and Russells. It is no coincidence that nine of the Top 13 families would get their names in a book which revealed the big names behind the worlds illegal narcotics trade. It should be mentioned that some other prominent Illuminati families also play key roles in the
drug trade such as the Bronfmans, Cabots, Shaws, Bacons, Perkins, Morgan, Forbes, Cisneros and
Oppenheimers.
(I was especially noticing Bronfmans and Perkins).
Gotta be dumb as a democrat to buy into that one.